docs: fixing typo in multiple files

[didier-durand]

Link to Issue or Description of Change

1. Link to an existing issue (if applicable): N/A

2. Or, if no issue exists, describe the change: fixing various typos in multiple files: see commit diffs for details

Problem:

Discovered typos while reading ADK repo

Solution:

Submitted this PR to fix them

Testing Plan

N/A: changes only in comments, .md and docstrings.

Unit Tests:

• [N/A ] I have added or updated unit tests for my change.
• All unit tests pass locally.

Please include a summary of passed pytest results.

Manual End-to-End (E2E) Tests:

N/A

Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
• I have performed a self-review of my own code.
• [N/A] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• [N/A] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
• [N/A] I have manually tested my changes end-to-end.
• [N/A] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Additional context

N/A

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @didier-durand, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the overall quality and readability of the codebase's documentation and comments by addressing numerous typos and grammatical inconsistencies. The changes are purely textual, affecting Markdown files, Python docstrings, and inline comments, ensuring that the project's explanatory content is accurate and professional without altering any functional aspects of the code.

Highlights

• Documentation Clarity: Corrected various spelling and grammatical errors across Markdown files and Python docstrings to enhance readability.
• Consistency in Terminology: Standardized terms like 'long running' to 'long-running' and 'multi-step' to 'multistep' for consistency.
• Grammar Refinement: Improved grammatical constructions in several comments and docstrings, such as 'an user' to 'a user' and 'not be partial' to 'not partial'.
• Unit of Measure Standardization: Standardized 'celsius' to 'Celsius' in temperature-related documentation.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request addresses several typos and grammatical errors across various documentation files, comments, and docstrings. The changes are clear and improve the overall readability of the codebase. I've made one suggestion to further improve the grammar in a docstring. Great work on catching these issues!

[ryanaiagent]

Hi @didier-durand , Thank you for your contribution! We appreciate you taking the time to submit this pull request.

[ryanaiagent]

Hi @seanzhou1023 , can you pls review this. LGTM.

[didier-durand]

@ryanaiagent : Rohit, my pleasure! I'll keep doing it if I find new ones.

[didier-durand]

Hi, anything else expected from me ?

[ryanaiagent]

Hi @didier-durand , no action is needed from your end.

[didier-durand]

Thanks for accepting this PR!

[adk-bot]

Thank you @didier-durand for your contribution! 🎉

Your changes have been successfully imported and merged via Copybara in commit 80ff067.

Closing this PR as the changes are now in the main branch.

[didier-durand]

My pleasure! Thanks for merging