Skip to content

Better docs/name needed for "multi-threaded" benchmarking #813

@LebedevRI

Description

@LebedevRI

Would it have been better if any of this would be in docs / is there anything brought up in this issue appears to be omitted in docs?

I think so, yes. Perhaps a sentence or two on the README regarding how the "multi-threaded" implementation spawns self-contained benchmark instances, and users should expect memory footprint for the benchmark program to grow linearly in the number of threads.

Originally posted by @jmftrindade in #806 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions