Skip to content

Conversation

@danielsuo
Copy link
Collaborator

Some notes:

  • Just updated tests to match whatever was in train.train
  • Had to change loss/accuracy thresholds slightly for the ensembling example

Hopefully nothing wrong or controversial.

Once this is in, we can verify that #248 is working (confirmed that #248 with this PR works locally).

Copy link
Contributor

@avital avital left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there's one mistake here maybe? But thanks and generally LGTM!

@avital avital self-assigned this May 12, 2020
@avital avital merged commit 58e340b into google:master May 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants