Skip to content

New protocol crackers#408

Open
traetox wants to merge 381 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
traetox:master
Open

New protocol crackers#408
traetox wants to merge 381 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
traetox:master

Conversation

@traetox
Copy link

@traetox traetox commented Jan 25, 2018

We implemented a Modbus, a good chunk of Ethernet/IP (ENIP), and some Common Industrial Protocol (CIP). The Modbus implementation doesn't have definitions for the specific request/response structures in the modbus payload due to the protocol assuming you know how to apply each structure based on tcp Src Port, but it gets you along way towards a modbus cracker.

ENIP is a GIANT protocol, and CIP is even worse. These are good first steps that implement many of the base layers.

unkaktus and others added 30 commits May 8, 2017 07:33
2. Corrected dimensions of lookup tables
3. Enable LinkType 105 (802.11) decoding
s/symetric/symmetric
s/soruce/source
Signed-off-by: Lehner Florian <dev@der-flo.net>
Signed-off-by: Lehner Florian <dev@der-flo.net>
Signed-off-by: Lehner Florian <dev@der-flo.net>
Signed-off-by: Lehner Florian <dev@der-flo.net>
pcap: make stoppable when no packets to sniff
Signed-off-by: Lehner Florian <dev@der-flo.net>
Signed-off-by: Lehner Florian <dev@der-flo.net>
Signed-off-by: Lehner Florian <dev@der-flo.net>
Signed-off-by: Lehner Florian <dev@der-flo.net>
@notti
Copy link
Contributor

notti commented Dec 21, 2018

Did all authors sign the CLA?

@traetox
Copy link
Author

traetox commented Dec 21, 2018 via email

@notti
Copy link
Contributor

notti commented Dec 21, 2018

Not sure if I can do this and if this works:
@googlebot rescan

@notti
Copy link
Contributor

notti commented Dec 21, 2018

@gconnell I think we need your help.

@gconnell
Copy link
Contributor

gconnell commented Jan 2, 2019

Bad googlebot, no cookie.

I'm going to try saying "I signed it". If that doesn't work, cann you try doing that as well? Hopefully one of those will hit the correct googlebot button.

@gconnell
Copy link
Contributor

gconnell commented Jan 2, 2019

I signed it.

@traetox
Copy link
Author

traetox commented Jan 2, 2019 via email

@gconnell
Copy link
Contributor

gconnell commented Jan 2, 2019

It looks like there's some commits from kristopher.watts@sinkholesoftware.com (https://github.com/google/gopacket/commit/6951f53738eaf788b2bdd472bc92183df0bc9bfc.patch) which we don't have a CLA for. john.floren@gravwell.io, your CLA checks out fine.

@traetox
Copy link
Author

traetox commented Jan 2, 2019 via email

@traetox
Copy link
Author

traetox commented Jan 2, 2019 via email

@gconnell
Copy link
Contributor

gconnell commented Jan 2, 2019

No worries, Googlebot should be fine with the change.

I believe the best way is to use 'git amend' to change the author locally, then force push the commits up to your pull request repo. That should cause all the right stuff to happen :)

@traetox
Copy link
Author

traetox commented Jan 2, 2019 via email

@googlebot
Copy link
Collaborator

So there's good news and bad news.

👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there.

😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request.

Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the cla/google commit status will not change from this state. It's up to you to confirm consent of all the commit author(s), set the cla label to yes (if enabled on your project), and then merge this pull request when appropriate.

@traetox
Copy link
Author

traetox commented Jan 2, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.