More field validation tests

[osa1]

For {extension,non-extension} {singular,repeated} fields, check range and type
checks.

All fields with range checks are tested. For type and nullability checks we
only use a message and a bool field, as there are too many types of fields
and most of them use the same validation function.

Fields with range checks are not tested for type and nullability checks. To
check whether a value is within range we have to use as a non-null int or
double, so if the value being checked doesn't have the right type the range
check function will throw anyway.

This reveals two inconsistencies in the library:

• When type of a non-repeated extension value is not right we throw an argument
  error instead of a type error.

• setExtension takes an Object (not nullable) as an argument but
  addExtension takes Object? (nullable).

I tested accordingly instead of trying to fix the inconsistencies as fixing
them will break downstream.