Skip to content

Conversation

@scotthart
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@scotthart scotthart requested a review from a team as a code owner November 11, 2025 22:23
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigtable Issues related to the Bigtable API. label Nov 11, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @scotthart, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the handling of thread-local Options within the Bigtable client library, particularly for asynchronous operations such as query plan refreshes. By explicitly saving and restoring the Options context at the point of execution for these operations, the changes ensure that the correct configuration and policies are applied, regardless of which thread ultimately processes the callback. This prevents potential inconsistencies and enhances the robustness of the client's asynchronous workflows.

Highlights

  • Thread-Local Options Handling: The PrepareQuery and AsyncPrepareQuery refresh functions have been updated to explicitly save and restore Options within their respective lambda captures. This ensures that the correct operational context is maintained when these asynchronous operations are executed, potentially on different threads.
  • Query Plan Refresh Context: The QueryPlan::ScheduleRefresh mechanism now captures the current Options and restores them using internal::OptionsSpan when its timer callback executes. This change addresses potential issues with thread-local Options in asynchronous timer events, guaranteeing consistent behavior.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a potential issue with Options propagation in asynchronous query plan refresh operations. By capturing the options when scheduling the refresh timer and restoring them within the timer's continuation using OptionsSpan, the changes ensure that the refresh logic executes with the correct context, regardless of which thread it runs on. The refactoring in DataConnectionImpl to rely on this mechanism simplifies the code by removing explicit Options passing. The implementation looks correct and robust.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.04%. Comparing base (361f9b8) to head (05cb0e1).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #15747   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.03%   93.04%           
=======================================
  Files        2445     2445           
  Lines      226049   226052    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits       210313   210321    +8     
+ Misses      15736    15731    -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.


auto refresh_fn = [this, request, current, func]() mutable {
auto refresh_fn = [this, request, func]() mutable {
auto current = google::cloud::internal::SaveCurrentOptions();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly documenting this for future reference: does this ensure that the options are preserved/available for the refresh query plan operation(which is performed on a different thread)?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This just ensures that when the refresh_fn is called it uses the Options from the current thread. The save/restore Options mechanism is part of the .then lambda on the refresh deadline timer in query_plan.cc

@scotthart scotthart merged commit 1e499d2 into googleapis:main Nov 12, 2025
69 of 71 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: bigtable Issues related to the Bigtable API.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants