-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 448
refactor(common): versioned namespace includes major, minor, patch #7464
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Binary file modified
BIN
+91 Bytes
(100%)
ci/abi-dumps/google_cloud_cpp_bigquery.expected.abi.dump.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file modified
BIN
+252 Bytes
(100%)
ci/abi-dumps/google_cloud_cpp_bigtable.expected.abi.dump.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file modified
BIN
+106 Bytes
(100%)
ci/abi-dumps/google_cloud_cpp_grpc_utils.expected.abi.dump.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file modified
BIN
+330 Bytes
(100%)
ci/abi-dumps/google_cloud_cpp_spanner.expected.abi.dump.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file modified
BIN
+826 Bytes
(100%)
ci/abi-dumps/google_cloud_cpp_storage.expected.abi.dump.gz
Binary file not shown.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting. I had thought about this "enforcing" an ABI break on each release, but I had not thought about the impact on our baselines. I am not sure if this is good, bad, or indifferent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as our ABI baselines dumps are concerned, I think this change is roughly equivalent to before, because we were already updating the baseline with each release, but now we need to do it at a different point in the release process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I think we have a problem for patch releases:
v1_101_0, e.g. assumegoogle::cloud::v1_101_0::Barexists.main.google::cloud::v1_101_0::Foo, we don't necessarily update the baseline because adding symbols does not break the CI builds.v1.101.0release.v1.101.xbranch contains the baseline withv1_101_0from whatever point it was last updated (which may not be the release point).v1.101.1v1.101.0was created, it is "stale"google::cloud::v1_101_0::Barwould be detected.google::cloud::v1_101_0::Foowould not be detected.