Skip to content

feat(storage): Add support for blob object in AAOW#16577

Merged
nidhiii-27 merged 11 commits intomainfrom
obj-metadata-in-aaow
Apr 23, 2026
Merged

feat(storage): Add support for blob object in AAOW#16577
nidhiii-27 merged 11 commits intomainfrom
obj-metadata-in-aaow

Conversation

@nidhiii-27
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nidhiii-27 nidhiii-27 commented Apr 8, 2026

Add support for adding custom metadata, content type and kms key name in appendable objects

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the asynchronous appendable object writer to support Blob metadata, allowing content_type and metadata to be set during object creation. The AsyncAppendableObjectWriter and _AsyncWriteObjectStream classes now accept an optional Blob object, and a new test snippet has been added to demonstrate this functionality. Feedback was provided regarding the indentation of the resource_params dictionary in async_write_object_stream.py.

@nidhiii-27 nidhiii-27 changed the title feat(storage): Add support for adding blob object in AAOW feat(storage): Add support for blob object in AAOW Apr 20, 2026
@nidhiii-27 nidhiii-27 force-pushed the obj-metadata-in-aaow branch from 13806cb to 292828e Compare April 21, 2026 07:29
@nidhiii-27 nidhiii-27 force-pushed the obj-metadata-in-aaow branch from 8d3d56b to 7b74863 Compare April 22, 2026 09:42
@nidhiii-27 nidhiii-27 marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2026 12:06
@nidhiii-27 nidhiii-27 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2026 12:06
@nidhiii-27 nidhiii-27 merged commit 3271831 into main Apr 23, 2026
30 checks passed
@nidhiii-27 nidhiii-27 deleted the obj-metadata-in-aaow branch April 23, 2026 09:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants