feat: [#280] Add Index methods #714
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve significant updates to the database schema management in the codebase. Key modifications include the addition of new methods for index management in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #714 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 69.84%
=========================================
Files ? 198
Lines ? 15562
Branches ? 0
=========================================
Hits ? 10869
Misses ? 4101
Partials ? 592 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
contracts/database/schema/index.go (1)
3-6: Add documentation to improve code clarity.The interface design looks good and follows the builder pattern appropriately. However, adding documentation would improve maintainability and usability:
+// IndexDefinition defines the interface for configuring database index properties. type IndexDefinition interface { + // Algorithm sets the index algorithm (e.g., "BTREE", "HASH") and returns the IndexDefinition + // for method chaining. Algorithm(algorithm string) IndexDefinition + // Name sets a custom name for the index and returns the IndexDefinition + // for method chaining. Name(name string) IndexDefinition }database/schema/index.go (3)
17-21: Consider adding algorithm validation.While the method implementation is correct, it might be beneficial to validate the algorithm parameter to ensure only supported database index algorithms are accepted (e.g., BTREE, HASH, etc.).
Example implementation:
func (f *IndexDefinition) Algorithm(algorithm string) schema.IndexDefinition { + validAlgorithms := map[string]bool{"BTREE": true, "HASH": true} + if !validAlgorithms[strings.ToUpper(algorithm)] { + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Unsupported index algorithm: %s", algorithm)) + } f.command.Algorithm = algorithm return f }
23-27: Consider adding index name validation.The method should validate the index name to ensure it:
- Is not empty
- Doesn't exceed database-specific length limits
- Contains only valid characters
- Follows any database-specific naming conventions
Example implementation:
func (f *IndexDefinition) Name(name string) schema.IndexDefinition { + if name == "" { + panic("Index name cannot be empty") + } + if len(name) > 64 { // Common max length for most databases + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Index name '%s' exceeds maximum length of 64 characters", name)) + } + if !regexp.MustCompile(`^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]*$`).MatchString(name) { + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Invalid index name format: %s", name)) + } f.command.Index = name return f }
1-27: Add package and type documentation.Consider adding:
- Package documentation explaining the schema package's purpose
- Type documentation for IndexDefinition explaining its role in index management
- Method documentation with examples
Example:
+// Package schema provides database schema manipulation functionality. package schema +// IndexDefinition provides a fluent interface for configuring database indexes. +// It implements the schema.IndexDefinition interface and allows method chaining +// for setting various index properties. type IndexDefinition struct { command *schema.Command }contracts/database/schema/blueprint.go (1)
26-27: Add documentation for the Index method.The method signature looks good, but please add a brief documentation comment describing the purpose and behavior of the Index method, similar to other methods in the interface.
+// Index Create a new index on the table for the specified columns. Index(column ...string) IndexDefinitiondatabase/schema/postgres_schema_test.go (2)
37-38: Consider tracking this TODO in the issue trackerEmpty test functions can affect test coverage metrics. It would be better to either implement the test now or track this as a separate issue.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of the types functionality and its corresponding tests?
42-56: Consider enhancing test coverage with additional casesGood use of table-driven tests! However, consider adding more test cases to cover:
- Invalid input formats
- Empty strings
- Special characters in schema/table names
- Case sensitivity scenarios
Consider this enhancement:
tests := []struct { + name string // Add descriptive names for each test case reference string expectedSchema string expectedTable string }{ - {"public.users", "public", "users"}, - {"users", "goravel", "users"}, + { + name: "explicit schema", + reference: "public.users", + expectedSchema: "public", + expectedTable: "users", + }, + { + name: "default schema", + reference: "users", + expectedSchema: "goravel", + expectedTable: "users", + }, + { + name: "empty reference", + reference: "", + expectedSchema: "goravel", + expectedTable: "", + }, + { + name: "special characters", + reference: "my-schema.user_table", + expectedSchema: "my-schema", + expectedTable: "user_table", + }, }database/schema/processors/postgres_test.go (1)
11-34: Enhance test coverage with additional edge casesWhile the current test cases cover basic functionality, consider adding the following scenarios for more robust testing:
- Table-driven tests for better test organization
- Nil input handling
- Index names with special characters or spaces
- Very long index names that might exceed database limits (e.g., PostgreSQL's 63-byte limit)
Here's a suggested refactor using table-driven tests:
func TestProcessIndexes(t *testing.T) { - // Test with valid indexes - input := []schema.Index{ - {Name: "INDEX_A", Type: "BTREE"}, - {Name: "INDEX_B", Type: "HASH"}, - } - expected := []schema.Index{ - {Name: "index_a", Type: "btree"}, - {Name: "index_b", Type: "hash"}, - } - - postgres := NewPostgres() - result := postgres.ProcessIndexes(input) - - assert.Equal(t, expected, result) - - // Test with empty input - input = []schema.Index{} - expected = []schema.Index{} - - result = postgres.ProcessIndexes(input) - - assert.Equal(t, expected, result) + tests := []struct { + name string + input []schema.Index + expected []schema.Index + }{ + { + name: "valid indexes", + input: []schema.Index{ + {Name: "INDEX_A", Type: "BTREE"}, + {Name: "INDEX_B", Type: "HASH"}, + }, + expected: []schema.Index{ + {Name: "index_a", Type: "btree"}, + {Name: "index_b", Type: "hash"}, + }, + }, + { + name: "empty input", + input: []schema.Index{}, + expected: []schema.Index{}, + }, + { + name: "nil input", + input: nil, + expected: []schema.Index{}, + }, + { + name: "special characters", + input: []schema.Index{ + {Name: "INDEX WITH SPACE", Type: "BTREE"}, + {Name: "INDEX@#$%", Type: "HASH"}, + }, + expected: []schema.Index{ + {Name: "index with space", Type: "btree"}, + {Name: "index@#$%", Type: "hash"}, + }, + }, + { + name: "long index name", + input: []schema.Index{ + {Name: "this_is_a_very_long_index_name_that_might_exceed_postgresql_limits_of_63_bytes", Type: "BTREE"}, + }, + expected: []schema.Index{ + {Name: "this_is_a_very_long_index_name_that_might_exceed_postgresql_limits_of_63_bytes", Type: "btree"}, + }, + }, + } + + postgres := NewPostgres() + for _, tt := range tests { + t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { + result := postgres.ProcessIndexes(tt.input) + assert.Equal(t, tt.expected, result) + }) + } }contracts/database/schema/grammar.go (2)
18-19: Consider adding documentation for index types.The method signature follows the established pattern and integrates well with the existing command-based compilation methods. Consider enhancing the documentation to specify supported index types and their use cases.
// CompileIndex Compile a plain index key command. +// Supported index types: +// - Basic index (single column) +// - Composite index (multiple columns) +// Returns the SQL statement for creating the specified index. CompileIndex(blueprint Blueprint, command *Command) string
20-21: Consider caching index metadata for performance.The method signature aligns well with other metadata retrieval methods in the interface. For better performance at scale, consider implementing a caching mechanism for index metadata, especially for frequently accessed tables.
This method might be called frequently during schema operations. Consider:
- Implementing a caching layer for index metadata
- Adding a method to refresh the cache when indexes change
- Using schema events to invalidate the cache automatically
contracts/database/schema/schema.go (1)
87-93: Consider adding additional index properties.The
Indexstruct is well-designed but could benefit from additional properties commonly used in database indexes:
UsingorMethod: For specifying index method (e.g., BTREE, HASH)Where: For partial indexesOptions: For database-specific index optionstype Index struct { Columns []string Name string Primary bool Type string Unique bool + Using string // Index method (BTREE, HASH, etc.) + Where string // Partial index condition + Options map[string]string // Database-specific options }database/schema/postgres_schema.go (3)
19-21: LGTM! Consider adding field documentation.The refactoring to use direct
schemaandprefixfields instead of a config object improves clarity. The constructor properly initializes all fields.Consider adding documentation comments for the new fields to explain their purpose:
type PostgresSchema struct { contractsschema.CommonSchema grammar *grammars.Postgres orm orm.Orm + // prefix is prepended to all table names prefix string processor processors.Postgres + // schema defines the PostgreSQL schema name schema string }Also applies to: 24-32
123-152: Consider enhancing error handling and struct organization.The implementation is well-structured with clear separation of concerns. However, there are some potential improvements:
- The error handling could be more specific for SQL scan errors
- The
Indexstruct could be moved to a separate package for better code organizationConsider these improvements:
+// Move to a separate types package +type PostgresIndex struct { + Columns string + Name string + Primary bool + Type string + Unique bool +} func (r *PostgresSchema) GetIndexes(table string) ([]contractsschema.Index, error) { schema, table := r.parseSchemaAndTable(table) table = r.prefix + table - type Index struct { - Columns string - Name string - Primary bool - Type string - Unique bool - } - var tempIndexes []Index + var tempIndexes []PostgresIndex if err := r.orm.Query().Raw(r.grammar.CompileIndexes(schema, table)).Scan(&tempIndexes); err != nil { - return nil, err + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to scan indexes: %w", err) }
163-173: Consider adding input validation.The helper method is well-implemented but could benefit from input validation to handle edge cases.
Consider adding validation:
func (r *PostgresSchema) parseSchemaAndTable(reference string) (schema, table string) { + if reference == "" { + return r.schema, "" + } + parts := strings.Split(reference, ".") schema = r.schema if len(parts) == 2 { schema = parts[0] parts = parts[1:] } + + if len(parts) == 0 { + return schema, "" + } table = parts[0] return }database/schema/blueprint.go (2)
99-103: Consider adding validation and documentation.The new
Indexmethod implementation looks clean, but consider these improvements:
- Add validation for empty column list
- Add documentation explaining the method's purpose and parameters
Consider this improvement:
+// Index creates a new index on the specified columns. +// Parameters: +// column: One or more column names to include in the index +// Returns: An IndexDefinition for further configuration func (r *Blueprint) Index(column ...string) schema.IndexDefinition { + if len(column) == 0 { + panic("At least one column must be specified for an index") + } command := r.indexCommand(constants.CommandIndex, column) return NewIndexDefinition(command) }
Line range hint
140-153: Consider adding error handling for unsupported commands.The
ToSqlmethod has been updated to handle index commands, but it silently skips unsupported commands. Consider adding error handling or logging for unsupported command types to aid in debugging.Here's a suggested improvement:
func (r *Blueprint) ToSql(grammar schema.Grammar) []string { r.addImpliedCommands(grammar) var statements []string for _, command := range r.commands { + if !isValidCommand(command.Name) { + log.Printf("Warning: Unsupported command type: %s", command.Name) + continue + } switch command.Name { case constants.CommandAdd: statements = append(statements, grammar.CompileAdd(r, command)) // ... existing cases ... } } return statements } +func isValidCommand(name string) bool { + validCommands := []string{ + constants.CommandAdd, + constants.CommandCreate, + constants.CommandDropIfExists, + constants.CommandIndex, + constants.CommandPrimary, + } + for _, cmd := range validCommands { + if cmd == name { + return true + } + } + return false +}database/schema/schema_test.go (2)
103-106: LGTM! Consider documenting the index naming convention.The change to use the "goravel_" prefix for the primary key index name is consistent with the framework's naming convention.
Consider adding a comment explaining the index naming convention for future maintainers.
108-137: Enhance index property verification coverage.The test method effectively verifies index creation and presence. However, the index property verification could be more comprehensive.
Consider enhancing the test by:
- Verifying properties of all indexes, not just "goravel_indexes_id_name_index"
- Adding assertions for "name_index" properties
Here's a suggested improvement:
for _, index := range indexes { if index.Name == "goravel_indexes_id_name_index" { s.ElementsMatch(index.Columns, []string{"id", "name"}) s.False(index.Primary) s.Equal("btree", index.Type) s.False(index.Unique) + } else if index.Name == "name_index" { + s.ElementsMatch(index.Columns, []string{"name"}) + s.False(index.Primary) + s.Equal("btree", index.Type) + s.False(index.Unique) } }database/schema/blueprint_test.go (1)
271-273: Consider refactoring driver-specific test assertions.The test cases for different drivers share similar assertion patterns. Consider extracting these into a table-driven test to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
Example refactor:
func (s *BlueprintTestSuite) TestToSql() { + tests := []struct { + driver database.Driver + grammar schema.Grammar + expectLen int + }{ + {database.DriverPostgres, s.grammars[database.DriverPostgres], 1}, + // Add other drivers here + } + + for _, test := range tests { + s.Run(string(test.driver), func() { + // Create table test + s.blueprint.Create() + s.blueprint.String("name") + s.Len(s.blueprint.ToSql(test.grammar), test.expectLen) + + // Update table test + s.SetupTest() + s.blueprint.String("avatar") + s.Len(s.blueprint.ToSql(test.grammar), test.expectLen) + }) + } }database/gorm/test_utils.go (1)
359-359: LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the search_path default.The mock configuration for PostgreSQL's search_path is correctly implemented with the standard default value "public". This aligns well with PostgreSQL's default behavior.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why "public" is used as the default value:
+ // Mock search_path configuration, defaulting to "public" schema as per PostgreSQL standard r.mockConfig.On("GetString", fmt.Sprintf("database.connections.%s.search_path", r.connection), "public").Return("public")database/schema/schema.go (3)
Line range hint
163-169: Avoid usinglog.Fatalfin library codeIn the
Tablemethod, errors are handled usingr.log.Fatalf, which will terminate the application. Since this is a library function, it is better to return an error and allow the caller to decide how to handle it.Apply this diff to return the error instead:
func (r *Schema) Table(table string, callback func(table contractsschema.Blueprint)) error { blueprint := r.createBlueprint(table) callback(blueprint) if err := r.build(blueprint); err != nil { - r.log.Fatalf("failed to modify %s table: %v", table, err) + return fmt.Errorf("failed to modify %s table: %v", table, err) } + return nil }This change promotes better error handling practices in library code.
149-151: Append migrations instead of overwriting inRegistermethodThe
Registermethod replaces the existing migrations with the new slice provided. If the intention is to allow multiple registrations to accumulate migrations, consider appending to the existing slice.Apply this diff to append migrations:
func (r *Schema) Register(migrations []contractsschema.Migration) { - r.migrations = migrations + r.migrations = append(r.migrations, migrations...) }This ensures that all registered migrations are retained.
101-114: Check for nil slice handling withslices.ContainsWhen
GetIndexListingreturnsnil,slices.Containscan still handle anilslice without panicking. However, returning an empty slice instead ofnilcould be clearer and prevent potential issues.Modify the return statement to return an empty slice:
- return nil + return []string{}This change ensures that the returned slice is always non-nil.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
mocks/database/schema/Blueprint.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/schema/DriverSchema.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/schema/Grammar.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/schema/IndexDefinition.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/schema/Schema.gois excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
contracts/database/schema/blueprint.go(1 hunks)contracts/database/schema/grammar.go(2 hunks)contracts/database/schema/index.go(1 hunks)contracts/database/schema/schema.go(3 hunks)database/gorm/test_utils.go(1 hunks)database/schema/blueprint.go(4 hunks)database/schema/blueprint_test.go(2 hunks)database/schema/constants/constants.go(1 hunks)database/schema/grammars/postgres.go(2 hunks)database/schema/grammars/postgres_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/grammars/utils.go(1 hunks)database/schema/index.go(1 hunks)database/schema/postgres_schema.go(6 hunks)database/schema/postgres_schema_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/processors/postgres.go(2 hunks)database/schema/processors/postgres_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/schema.go(7 hunks)database/schema/schema_test.go(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- database/schema/constants/constants.go
🔇 Additional comments (18)
contracts/database/schema/index.go (1)
3-6: Verify interface implementation consistency.
Let's ensure that all implementations of this interface follow consistent patterns.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response as there's enough information to verify the interface implementation consistency:
Interface implementation is consistent and well-structured
The codebase shows a single concrete implementation in database/schema/index.go that properly implements both required methods, along with corresponding mock implementations for testing. The implementation follows a consistent pattern where:
- Both methods return the interface type as required
- The concrete implementation maintains internal state via the
commandfield - Method implementations are concise and focused
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all implementations and usages of IndexDefinition interface
# Find potential implementations
echo "=== Potential IndexDefinition implementations ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}
func ($_ $_) Algorithm($_) IndexDefinition {
$$$
}
func ($_ $_) Name($_) IndexDefinition {
$$$
}'
# Find interface usage patterns
echo -e "\n=== IndexDefinition usage patterns ==="
rg -A 2 "IndexDefinition"
Length of output: 9081
database/schema/index.go (3)
1-5: LGTM: Package structure and imports are well-organized.
The package follows Go conventions and correctly imports the necessary contract interface.
7-9: LGTM: Well-designed struct with proper encapsulation.
The struct follows good design principles by:
- Using a pointer for the command field which may be modified
- Keeping the field private to maintain encapsulation
11-15: LGTM: Constructor follows Go best practices.
The constructor is well-implemented:
- Returns the interface type instead of the concrete type
- Follows Go naming conventions with the "New" prefix
database/schema/processors/postgres.go (1)
4-5: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate
The addition of the strings package import is necessary for the new string manipulation operations.
contracts/database/schema/blueprint.go (1)
35-35: Verify impact of breaking change in ToSql signature.
Removing the query parameter from ToSql(grammar Grammar) []string is a breaking change that will require updates to all implementations of the Blueprint interface.
Let's verify all implementations of the Blueprint interface to ensure they're updated:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Breaking change in ToSql signature has been properly implemented.
The codebase search reveals that there is only one concrete implementation of the Blueprint interface in database/schema/blueprint.go, and its ToSql method has been updated to match the new signature ToSql(grammar Grammar) []string. No other implementations were found that need updating, and no usages of the old signature remain in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all implementations of Blueprint interface to verify signature updates
# Search for Blueprint implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}
func (r $_) ToSql($$$) []string'
# Also search for any remaining old signature usage
rg -l 'ToSql.*orm\.Query.*Grammar.*\[\]string'
Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find Blueprint implementations and ToSql usages
# Find files containing "Blueprint" interface or struct
rg -l "Blueprint"
# Find all ToSql method implementations with context
rg -A 3 "func.*ToSql"
# Find interface definition
rg -A 5 "type Blueprint interface"
Length of output: 28177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the actual implementations of Blueprint interface and their ToSql methods
# Find all struct types that might implement Blueprint
rg -A 2 "type.*struct" database/schema/
# Find all ToSql implementations in schema package
rg -A 3 "func.*ToSql.*Grammar.*\[\]string" database/schema/
Length of output: 3001
database/schema/postgres_schema_test.go (1)
34-34: LGTM: Constructor simplification
The simplified constructor call with direct parameters improves test clarity by removing unnecessary mock configuration.
contracts/database/schema/grammar.go (1)
7-7: Verify implementations of simplified CompileCreate method.
The removal of the query orm.Query parameter is a good simplification of the interface. However, as this is a breaking change, we should verify all implementations are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide the final response:
Simplified CompileCreate signature change is correctly implemented
The removal of the query parameter from CompileCreate method is properly implemented across the codebase:
- The interface in
contracts/database/schema/grammar.godefines the new signature - The concrete implementation in
database/schema/grammars/postgres.gomatches the new signature - The mock implementation in
mocks/database/schema/Grammar.gois also updated accordingly - The method is used correctly in
database/schema/blueprint.go
The simplification is a good change as the query parameter wasn't being used in the implementation, making the interface cleaner and more focused.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all implementations of CompileCreate to ensure they've been updated
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($x *$type) CompileCreate(blueprint $_, query $_) $_'
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for CompileCreate implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($x *$type) CompileCreate($$$) $_'
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also search for any files that might implement Grammar interface
rg -l "type.*Grammar" --type go
Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for struct types that might implement Grammar
rg "struct.*Grammar" --type go
Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the mock implementation to see if it's been updated
cat mocks/database/schema/Grammar.go
Length of output: 25244
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also search for any test files that might use CompileCreate
rg "CompileCreate" --type go -C 2
Length of output: 4830
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation in postgres.go
cat database/schema/grammars/postgres.go
Length of output: 6380
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check if there are any other grammar implementations
fd "grammar.*\.go" --type f
Length of output: 99
contracts/database/schema/schema.go (1)
18-21: LGTM! Well-designed index management methods.
The new methods GetIndexListing and HasIndex are well-documented and provide a clean interface for index management operations. The method signatures are appropriate for their intended functionality.
database/schema/postgres_schema.go (1)
37-37: LGTM! Schema reference updates are consistent.
The changes correctly utilize the new schema field across all schema-related operations while maintaining proper escaping.
Also applies to: 66-66, 100-100
database/schema/grammars/postgres_test.go (1)
85-85: LGTM! Method signature update is consistent.
The removal of the query parameter from CompileCreate call aligns with the interface changes. The test continues to validate the SQL generation correctly.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have comprehensive information about all CompileCreate method signatures and calls across the codebase:
Method signature is consistently updated across the codebase
The removal of the query parameter from CompileCreate is correctly implemented throughout:
- Interface definition in
contracts/database/schema/grammar.goshows the updated signature - Implementation in
database/schema/grammars/postgres.gomatches the interface - All calls in
database/schema/blueprint.goand tests use the new signature - Mock implementations in
mocks/database/schema/Grammar.goare aligned
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify CompileCreate method signature is consistent across the codebase
# and no old signatures remain
# Search for CompileCreate method definitions and calls
rg -A 2 'CompileCreate.*\('
Length of output: 2589
database/schema/blueprint_test.go (2)
125-131: LGTM: Parameter removal aligns with interface changes.
The removal of the mockQuery parameter from ToSql calls maintains the test's logical flow while simplifying the interface.
262-264: LGTM: Driver-specific test case maintains correctness.
The simplified ToSql call preserves the PostgreSQL-specific test behavior.
database/schema/schema.go (3)
25-27: Consistent use of contractsschema interfaces
The code consistently replaces schema with contractsschema, improving clarity by explicitly referencing the contracts package. This enhances code maintainability and readability.
Also applies to: 36-37, 70-70, 74-74
5-5:
Verify the availability of the slices package
The slices package was added to the standard library in Go 1.21. Ensure that the project uses Go 1.21 or later. If backward compatibility is required, consider importing golang.org/x/exp/slices instead.
Run the following script to check the Go version specified in go.mod:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the Go version used in the project.
# Expected: Go version should be 1.21 or higher.
grep '^go [0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+' go.modLine range hint 172-180: Ensure transaction safety in the build method
In the build method, the check for r.orm.Query().InTransaction() determines whether to execute the blueprint build within a transaction. Verify that this logic correctly handles nested transactions and conforms to the expected behavior in your ORM implementation.
Run the following script to check for proper transaction handling in related methods:
This helps ensure that transaction management is consistent and safe.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the transaction implementation to verify this properly.
Let me try a different approach to find the implementation details.
Let me check one more aspect to understand the GORM implementation better.
Let me check the actual implementation of the Transaction method in the GORM adapter.
Based on all the gathered information, I can now provide the final response.
Transaction handling in build method is correctly implemented
The implementation is safe and properly handles transactions:
- The
InTransaction()check correctly detects if we're already in a transaction using GORM's connection pool state - When not in a transaction, it creates a new one with proper rollback on error
- Nested transactions are handled appropriately as the code reuses the existing transaction when
InTransaction()is true
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usages of transactions in the ORM implementation to verify nested transaction support.
# Expected: Review the methods that handle transactions.
rg 'Transaction\(' ./contracts/database/orm
Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation of Transaction and InTransaction methods
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($_ Query) Transaction(txFunc func(tx Query) error) error {
$$$
}'
# Also check for InTransaction implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($_ Query) InTransaction() bool {
$$$
}'
# Let's also search for any tests related to nested transactions
rg -A 5 'TestTransaction.*nested|nested.*transaction'
Length of output: 225
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Transaction implementation in the entire codebase
rg -A 10 'func.*Transaction\(txFunc func\(tx Query\)'
# Search for InTransaction implementation
rg -A 5 'func.*InTransaction\(\) bool'
# Look for any transaction-related tests
fd -e test.go -x rg -l 'Transaction'
Length of output: 726
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the GORM query implementation for Transaction method
rg -A 10 'func \(r \*Query\) Transaction' database/gorm/
# Look for any transaction-related documentation or comments
rg -B 2 -A 2 'transaction' README.md
# Check if there are any transaction-related errors or edge cases handled
rg 'transaction.*error|error.*transaction' -i
Length of output: 3038
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the GORM query implementation for Transaction method
rg -A 15 'func \(r \*Query\) Transaction' database/gorm/query.go
# Also check the base ORM implementation
rg -A 15 'func \(r \*Orm\) Transaction' database/orm/orm.go
Length of output: 412
database/schema/grammars/postgres.go (2)
74-93: Verify that quoteString properly sanitizes inputs in CompileIndexes to prevent SQL injection
In the CompileIndexes method, the variables table and schema are used in the SQL query after being passed through quoteString(). Please confirm that quoteString() correctly sanitizes these inputs to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities.
You can use the following shell script to locate the implementation of quoteString():
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find the definition of the `quoteString` function.
# Expected: Output displaying the implementation of `quoteString()`.
rg -A 5 'func\s+quoteString\('36-38: Ensure all method calls to CompileCreate are updated to match the new signature
The CompileCreate method signature has been changed by removing the query orm.Query parameter. Please verify that all calls to this method throughout the codebase have been updated accordingly to prevent any compile-time or runtime errors.
Here's a shell script to find any method calls that might still be using the old signature:
✅ Verification successful
No issues found with CompileCreate method calls
Based on the verification results, all usages of CompileCreate are consistent with the new signature that takes only a single blueprint parameter. This is confirmed by:
- The interface definition in
contracts/database/schema/grammar.gowhich declaresCompileCreate(blueprint Blueprint) string - All implementations and calls in the codebase match this signature:
- Implementation in
database/schema/grammars/postgres.go - Usage in
database/schema/blueprint.go - Test implementation in
database/schema/grammars/postgres_test.go - Mock implementation in
mocks/database/schema/Grammar.go
- Implementation in
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for method calls to `CompileCreate` that pass more than one argument.
# Expected: No output if all calls have been updated.
rg 'CompileCreate\(\s*\w+\s*,\s*\w+[^)]*\)'
Length of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for all usages of CompileCreate method
rg -A 3 "CompileCreate\("
# Also search for the interface definition to understand the contract
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
CompileCreate($_) $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2349
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.
| Benchmark suite | Current: 9afcdef | Previous: 94aaaed | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_Fatal |
2e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
1e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
2 |
Benchmark_Fatal - ns/op |
2e-7 ns/op |
1e-7 ns/op |
2 |
BenchmarkFile_ReadWrite |
296931 ns/op 1800 B/op 21 allocs/op |
197110 ns/op 1801 B/op 21 allocs/op |
1.51 |
BenchmarkFile_ReadWrite - ns/op |
296931 ns/op |
197110 ns/op |
1.51 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
database/schema/processors/postgres.go (1)
Line range hint
25-62: Improve robustness of type processingConsider these improvements:
- Move type/category maps to package-level constants to prevent recreation on each call
- Add handling for unknown types/categories
- Add validation for input types
+var ( + processTypeMap = map[string]string{ + "b": "base", + // ... rest of the map + } + processCategoryMap = map[string]string{ + "a": "array", + // ... rest of the map + } +) func (r Postgres) ProcessTypes(types []schema.Type) []schema.Type { - processType := map[string]string{ - "b": "base", - // ... rest of the map - } - processCategory := map[string]string{ - "a": "array", - // ... rest of the map - } + if types == nil { + return nil + } for i, t := range types { - types[i].Type = processType[t.Type] - types[i].Category = processCategory[t.Category] + if newType, ok := processTypeMap[t.Type]; ok { + types[i].Type = newType + } else { + types[i].Type = "unknown" + } + if newCategory, ok := processCategoryMap[t.Category]; ok { + types[i].Category = newCategory + } else { + types[i].Category = "unknown" + } } return types }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
database/schema/grammars/utils.go(1 hunks)database/schema/processors/postgres.go(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- database/schema/grammars/utils.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
database/schema/processors/postgres.go (2)
16-23: Add validation for index name format
While converting to lowercase is good, PostgreSQL has specific requirements for index names:
- Maximum length of 63 bytes
- Must start with a letter
- Can only contain letters, numbers, and underscores
Consider adding validation to ensure index names meet PostgreSQL requirements.
func (r Postgres) ProcessIndexes(indexes []schema.Index) []schema.Index {
+ if indexes == nil {
+ return nil
+ }
for i, index := range indexes {
+ // Validate index name format
+ if len(index.Name) > 63 {
+ index.Name = index.Name[:63]
+ }
+ if !strings.HasPrefix(index.Name, "_") && !strings.ContainsAny(index.Name, "!@#$%^&*()+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?/") {
indexes[i].Name = strings.ToLower(index.Name)
+ }
indexes[i].Type = strings.ToLower(index.Type)
}
return indexes
}The nil check suggestion from the previous review is still valid and should be implemented.
Line range hint 9-14: Ensure consistent receiver types across methods
The constructor returns a value type Postgres, but there's inconsistency in receiver types across methods:
ProcessIndexesuses value receiver(r Postgres)ProcessTypesuses value receiver(r Postgres)
This is good! The receiver types are now consistent with the constructor. However, verify that all callers are properly initialized.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:
Receiver type consistency is correctly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The constructor
NewPostgres()returns a value type and is consistently used across the codebase - All callers initialize and use the processor correctly as a value type:
- In
postgres_schema.go:processor: processors.NewPostgres() - In test files:
postgres := NewPostgres()
- In
The receiver types are consistent with the initialization pattern, and no issues were found in the usage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify processor initialization and usage
# Check how the Postgres processor is initialized and used
rg -A 2 "processor.*\*?processors\.Postgres"
rg -A 2 "NewPostgres\(\)"
Length of output: 1983
📑 Description
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
GetIndexListing,HasIndex,CompileIndex, andCompileIndexes.IndexDefinitioninterface for defining index properties.Postgresstruct with a new method,ProcessIndexes, for processing index data.quoteString, for formatting strings as quoted SQL literals.Bug Fixes
Documentation
These updates enhance the schema management capabilities and streamline interactions with database indexes.
✅ Checks