-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
chore: replace protobuf #886
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the project's dependency management as defined in the Changes
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (1.62.2)Error: can't load config: the Go language version (go1.23) used to build golangci-lint is lower than the targeted Go version (1.24.0) ✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.
| Benchmark suite | Current: d35aa27 | Previous: 460946e | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_EncryptString |
6085 ns/op 2160 B/op 15 allocs/op |
2230 ns/op 2160 B/op 15 allocs/op |
2.73 |
Benchmark_EncryptString - ns/op |
6085 ns/op |
2230 ns/op |
2.73 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #886 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 66.42% 67.65% +1.22%
==========================================
Files 151 152 +1
Lines 10376 10050 -326
==========================================
- Hits 6892 6799 -93
+ Misses 3126 2925 -201
+ Partials 358 326 -32 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
grpc/test.proto (1)
16-18: Add RPC method documentation.Consider adding documentation comments to describe the purpose and behavior of the Get RPC method.
service TestService { + // Get returns a test response with a message and code. + // If the request name is "success", it returns a success response. + // Otherwise, it returns an error. rpc Get(TestRequest) returns (TestResponse) {} }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
grpc/test.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gogrpc/test_grpc.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
grpc/application_test.go(2 hunks)grpc/test.proto(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
grpc/application_test.go (2)
72-73: LGTM! Improved test assertions.The split assertions provide better test granularity and make test failures more specific and easier to debug.
333-335: LGTM! Following gRPC best practices.Embedding
UnimplementedTestServiceServerensures forward compatibility, allowing new methods to be added to the service without breaking existing implementations.grpc/test.proto (3)
1-5: LGTM! Proper protobuf configuration.Using proto3 syntax and correct go_package option.
7-9: LGTM! Clean message definition.Simple and clear TestRequest message with proper field numbering.
11-14: LGTM! Well-structured response message.TestResponse message with appropriate field types and proper field numbering.
📑 Description
Summary by CodeRabbit
-
- Introduced a new gRPC service with a
-
- Updated internal dependency management to utilize a more current library version, enhancing stability and maintainability. This behind-the-scenes improvement lays the groundwork for smoother updates and overall better performance.
-
- Enhanced test assertions for improved accuracy in the
do check the following fields as needed - -->New Features
Getmethod, along withTestRequestandTestResponsemessage types.Chores
Bug Fixes
TestRunfunction.