Skip to content

Conversation

@Kangz
Copy link
Contributor

@Kangz Kangz commented Nov 30, 2018

This makes it more clear that this dictionary is meant to be used inside
the BindGroupDescriptor and not BindGroupLayoutDescriptor.

This makes it more clear that this dictionary is meant to be used inside
the BindGroupDescriptor and not BindGroupLayoutDescriptor.
@kvark
Copy link
Contributor

kvark commented Nov 30, 2018

uh, it honestly feels a bit too long now. Maybe we should keep it short and make sure the other one is longer, since it's not going to be used as much?

@Kangz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kangz commented Nov 30, 2018

I don't mind either way but I thought I'd raise this since I'm adding the structure in Dawn (as part of the "BindGroup descriptorization"). Note that in JS we wouldn't ever type the name of the structure.

@magcius
Copy link

magcius commented Dec 2, 2018

We already have BindGroupLayoutBinding (which this mirrors), so this is fine to me.

@Kangz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kangz commented Dec 3, 2018

No strong signal in the 2018-12-03 meeting, @jdashg what's your opinion? @kvark does the fact that JS doesn't need to mention the type change your opinion?

@grorg
Copy link
Contributor

grorg commented Dec 10, 2018

This was discussed in the 10 Dec 2018 meeting

@grorg
Copy link
Contributor

grorg commented Dec 10, 2018

Approved at that meeting.

@kdashg
Copy link
Contributor

kdashg commented Dec 10, 2018

I always thought WebGPUBinding was super ambiguous, so I'm glad to see it clarified.

@kdashg kdashg merged commit fa21d82 into gpuweb:master Dec 10, 2018
@Kangz Kangz deleted the binding branch February 1, 2019 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants