GFQL: admit bounded ORDER/LIMIT MATCH reentry top-k (#1342)#1346
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced May 7, 2026
414d602 to
b043334
Compare
b043334 to
6e607c9
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
Issue #1342 (under #880 umbrella) tracks a benchmark-visible gap where ordered top-k prefixes were rejected before trailing MATCH re-entry, even though runtime reentry seeding already preserves prefix row order.
Validation
Issue links