Skip to content

Commit 674b787

Browse files
authored
Update README.md
1 parent b4defa2 commit 674b787

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ The performance of both languages was benchmarked using Hyperfine. Programs were
3434
## Comparing the advantages of both
3535
1: Python installation was much simpler compared to Mojo. Installing Mojo was not user-friendly; it would have been better if there was a one-click installation option for Mojo on Windows, similar to Python.
3636

37-
2: The syntax of Mojo and Python was quite similar, with the main difference being that in Mojo, you need to use Python functions by importing them. For example, to take user input, you have to import the "input" function from Python. This made Python easier to learn.
37+
2: The syntax of Mojo and Python was quite similar, with the main difference being that in Mojo, you need to use Python functions by importing them. For example, to take user input, you have to import the "input" function from Python. This made Python easier to learn
3838

3939
3: Mojo provided helpful explanations with each error, making it easier for me to understand and identify my mistakes. Python, on the other hand, lacked this feature, which is an advantage of Mojo.
4040

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)