You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ The performance of both languages was benchmarked using Hyperfine. Programs were
34
34
## Comparing the advantages of both
35
35
1: Python installation was much simpler compared to Mojo. Installing Mojo was not user-friendly; it would have been better if there was a one-click installation option for Mojo on Windows, similar to Python.
36
36
37
-
2: The syntax of Mojo and Python was quite similar, with the main difference being that in Mojo, you need to use Python functions by importing them. For example, to take user input, you have to import the "input" function from Python. This made Python easier to learn.
37
+
2: The syntax of Mojo and Python was quite similar, with the main difference being that in Mojo, you need to use Python functions by importing them. For example, to take user input, you have to import the "input" function from Python. This made Python easier to learn
38
38
39
39
3: Mojo provided helpful explanations with each error, making it easier for me to understand and identify my mistakes. Python, on the other hand, lacked this feature, which is an advantage of Mojo.
0 commit comments