Skip to content

Commit 7132388

Browse files
yunxialigregkh
authored andcommitted
drm/amdgpu: set sub_block_index for mca ras sub-blocks
[ Upstream commit baa286d ] The mca ras sub-blocks (mp0, mp1, mpio) all share the AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__MCA block id and are distinguished only by sub_block_index. The ras manager object for an mca block is selected with: con->objs[AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__LAST + head->sub_block_index] Since the rework in commit 7f544c5 ("drm/amdgpu: Rework mca ras sw_init") moved the ras_comm setup into amdgpu_mca_mp*_ras_sw_init() but left sub_block_index unset, mp0/mp1/mpio all default to index 0 and collide on the same object slot. mp0 grabs the slot and creates its sysfs node first; mp1 (and mpio) then find the slot already in use, so amdgpu_ras_block_late_init() -> amdgpu_ras_sysfs_create() returns -EINVAL: amdgpu: mca.mp1 failed to execute ras_block_late_init_default! ret:-22 amdgpu: amdgpu_ras_late_init failed -22 amdgpu: amdgpu_device_ip_late_init failed amdgpu: Fatal error during GPU init The error is currently masked because amdgpu_ras_late_init() does not check the return value of amdgpu_ras_block_late_init_default(), but it already leaves mp1/mpio without their sysfs nodes and becomes a fatal init failure as soon as that return value is honored. Restore the per-sub-block sub_block_index assignment so each mca sub-block maps to its own object slot. Fixes: 7f544c5 ("drm/amdgpu: Rework mca ras sw_init") Signed-off-by: Yunxiang Li <Yunxiang.Li@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1 parent eee07d7 commit 7132388

1 file changed

Lines changed: 3 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mca.c

Lines changed: 3 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ int amdgpu_mca_mp0_ras_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
8989

9090
strcpy(ras->ras_block.ras_comm.name, "mca.mp0");
9191
ras->ras_block.ras_comm.block = AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__MCA;
92+
ras->ras_block.ras_comm.sub_block_index = AMDGPU_RAS_MCA_BLOCK__MP0;
9293
ras->ras_block.ras_comm.type = AMDGPU_RAS_ERROR__MULTI_UNCORRECTABLE;
9394
adev->mca.mp0.ras_if = &ras->ras_block.ras_comm;
9495

@@ -113,6 +114,7 @@ int amdgpu_mca_mp1_ras_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
113114

114115
strcpy(ras->ras_block.ras_comm.name, "mca.mp1");
115116
ras->ras_block.ras_comm.block = AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__MCA;
117+
ras->ras_block.ras_comm.sub_block_index = AMDGPU_RAS_MCA_BLOCK__MP1;
116118
ras->ras_block.ras_comm.type = AMDGPU_RAS_ERROR__MULTI_UNCORRECTABLE;
117119
adev->mca.mp1.ras_if = &ras->ras_block.ras_comm;
118120

@@ -137,6 +139,7 @@ int amdgpu_mca_mpio_ras_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
137139

138140
strcpy(ras->ras_block.ras_comm.name, "mca.mpio");
139141
ras->ras_block.ras_comm.block = AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__MCA;
142+
ras->ras_block.ras_comm.sub_block_index = AMDGPU_RAS_MCA_BLOCK__MPIO;
140143
ras->ras_block.ras_comm.type = AMDGPU_RAS_ERROR__MULTI_UNCORRECTABLE;
141144
adev->mca.mpio.ras_if = &ras->ras_block.ras_comm;
142145

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)