You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
Frederic Weisbecker
authored and
Thomas Gleixner
committed
tick/sched: Unify idle cputime accounting
The non-vtime dynticks-idle cputime accounting is a big mess that
accumulates within two concurrent statistics, each having their own
shortcomings:
* The accounting for online CPUs which is based on the delta between
tick_nohz_start_idle() and tick_nohz_stop_idle().
Pros:
- Works when the tick is off
- Has nsecs granularity
Cons:
- Account idle steal time but doesn't substract it from idle
cputime.
- Assumes CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING by not accounting IRQs but
the IRQ time is simply ignored when
CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=n
- The windows between 1) idle task scheduling and the first call
to tick_nohz_start_idle() and 2) idle task between the last
tick_nohz_stop_idle() and the rest of the idle time are
blindspots wrt. cputime accounting (though mostly insignificant
amount)
- Relies on private fields outside of kernel stats, with specific
accessors.
* The accounting for offline CPUs which is based on ticks and the
jiffies delta during which the tick was stopped.
Pros:
- Handles steal time correctly
- Handle CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=y and
CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=n correctly.
- Handles the whole idle task
- Accounts directly to kernel stats, without midlayer accumulator.
Cons:
- Doesn't elapse when the tick is off, which doesn't make it
suitable for online CPUs.
- Has TICK_NSEC granularity (jiffies)
- Needs to track the dyntick-idle ticks that were accounted and
substract them from the total jiffies time spent while the tick
was stopped. This is an ugly workaround.
Having two different accounting for a single context is not the only
problem: since those accountings are of different natures, it is
possible to observe the global idle time going backward after a CPU goes
offline.
Clean up the situation with introducing a hybrid approach that stays
coherent and works for both online and offline CPUs:
* Tick based or native vtime accounting operate before the idle loop
is entered and resume once the idle loop prepares to exit.
* When the idle loop starts, switch to dynticks-idle accounting as is
done currently, except that the statistics accumulate directly to the
relevant kernel stat fields.
* Private dyntick cputime accounting fields are removed.
* Works on both online and offline case.
Further improvement will include:
* Only switch to dynticks-idle cputime accounting when the tick actually
goes in dynticks mode.
* Handle CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=n correctly such that the
dynticks-idle accounting still elapses while on IRQs.
* Correctly substract idle steal cputime from idle time
Reported-by: Xin Zhao <jackzxcui1989@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260508131647.43868-8-frederic@kernel.org
0 commit comments