Skip to content

Conversation

@odgrim
Copy link
Contributor

@odgrim odgrim commented Nov 6, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated drift detection workflow configuration documentation with new input parameters for improved workflow integration and clarity.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 6, 2025 7:21am

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Walkthrough

A documentation file was updated to reflect changes in GitHub Actions workflow inputs. The workflow invocation example now uses pipelines_drift_detection_filter and pipelines_drift_detection_branch instead of the previous path and branch-name parameters.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow Input Updates
docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/guides/installing-drift-detection.md
Renamed workflow inputs from path and branch-name to pipelines_drift_detection_filter and pipelines_drift_detection_branch in the reusable workflow invocation example

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Simple parameter renaming in documentation example
  • Straightforward, non-code update with minimal complexity

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

v4

Suggested reviewers

  • oredavids

Poem

📝 The workflow inputs dance and sway,
Old names fade, new names play,
Documentation gets a gentle update,
Parameters renamed—clean and straight!
🔄

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes a copy-paste error fix in drift detection setup, directly matching the changeset which corrects workflow input parameter mappings.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-drift-detection

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a50ba72 and b72612e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/guides/installing-drift-detection.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Validate generated content
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/guides/installing-drift-detection.md (1)

70-71: Parameter naming is now consistent with the input definitions.

The workflow invocation parameters are correctly aligned with the input definitions declared above (lines 56–62), and they also match the GitLab configuration (lines 108–109). This fixes the copy-paste error and ensures clarity across platform examples.

To confirm the fix is complete, please verify that pipelines_drift_detection_filter and pipelines_drift_detection_branch match the actual input names expected by the reusable workflow at gruntwork-io/pipelines-workflows/.github/workflows/pipelines-drift-detection.yml@v4. You can check this by reviewing the reusable workflow file or its documentation.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@odgrim odgrim merged commit 65103ff into main Nov 7, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants