support case_result_statuses in robot#418
Open
codambro wants to merge 2 commits intogurock:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Will need to adjust affected unit tests. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue being resolved: #417
Solution description
Using case_result_statuses logic in both robot and junit imports
Changes
Move common function to parent class, then call in both Junit and Robot reader
Potential impacts
None
Steps to test
JUnit import without custom statuses
JUnit import with custom statuses
Robot import without custom statuses
Robot import with custom statuses
PR Tasks