Skip to content

Remove requirement for an AGM #17

@alexjj

Description

@alexjj

Propose the intent of suitably editing the articles so it is not compulsory for there to be an annual general meeting.

I think a legalese style meeting is not worthwhile for us. I'd rather have "meeting" (defined as a call to arms for everyone to come this day, vs. the usual tuesday open day email) where people suggest ideas, thoughts, plans, activities, complaints, etc. on a casual level and a little coordination around those instead. It seems difficult enough to arrange one annual meeting, so lets not waste it.

Probably there are knock on impacts of not requiring an AGM, but I'm sure they can be worked around. Like director nominations and issue of accounts. Reports can be send via email on an appropriate basis. Directors...I dunno...people stay in position until they don't want to and then seek out others who are interested?

I'd propose wording on these knock on items should be generally vague to give us the ability to do what's sensible without a lot of "hoo-har".

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions