Recommend local flashing over remote#13
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Local flashing is more reliable because the image is already on the device — no network dependencies during the flash. Remote flashing can fail silently due to firewalls, leaving users confused when the device boots back to the previous OS with no error message. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
mairas
force-pushed
the
docs/recommend-local-flashing
branch
from
6435e9c to
6696b62
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
scporcurlA user attempted remote flashing but the device booted back to the previous OS with no error — likely a firewall issue. Local flashing avoids this class of problems entirely.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code