Use consistent notation for array registers

[glopesdev]

Array registers should be clearly indicated in the table and hyperlinks. The length of all array registers is now clearly indicated in the register specification.

Fixes #177

[bruno-f-cruz]

I am ok with merging as is.

However I still wonder if we should not explicitly state the length of registers more prominently. For instance, is it clear why the data type (eg U8) is in the title but not the length or the register? All registers have both attributes (most length =1, but still...)

[glopesdev]

However I still wonder if we should not explicitly state the length of registers more prominently.

@bruno-f-cruz the problem is we really have no more space available in the table without breaking formatting. There are tons of details per register, most of them are not even visible in the table at all, and they are in my opinion even more important than knowing the lengths of these specific registers, so it's a tradeoff. I am happy to take suggestions though.

[bruno-f-cruz]

However I still wonder if we should not explicitly state the length of registers more prominently.

@bruno-f-cruz the problem is we really have no more space available in the table without breaking formatting. There are tons of details per register, most of them are not even visible in the table at all, and they are in my opinion even more important than knowing the lengths of these specific registers, so it's a tradeoff. I am happy to take suggestions though.

How about we do the following in the text:

R_FOO – Short Foo description

Address: 000
Data Type: U8
Length: 1

[glopesdev]

@bruno-f-cruz fair enough, I added the length to all register specifications.