Remove ExtendedLength from protocol specification#209
Merged
Conversation
The nerd who wrote Harp Regulator's implementation implemented it for receiving because he's a spec pedant. (Although he got lazy when it came to sending.) (That being said it should definitely go lol) |
PathogenDavid
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2026
bruno-f-cruz
force-pushed
the
refactor-remove-extended-length
branch
from
9d58bb8 to
30eb6bc
Compare
glopesdev
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR closes #188 by removing the
ExtendedLengthspecification from the protocol.While this is technically a breaking change, it should be considered since: