Skip to content

Conversation

@isivaselvan
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Features providing Policy API Specs

  • List all the policies of the given organization.
  • Create a new policy in the given organization.
  • Read a specific policy by its ID.
  • Update an existing policy by its ID.
  • Delete a specific policy by its ID.
  • Upload the policy content of the policy.
  • Download the policy content of the policy.
  • Modified HTTP file --> Included the parameter at request method to accept bytes for Upload.
  • Added Test cases and Examples.

Testing plan

External links

JIRA

Output from tests

Including output from tests may require access to a TFE instance. Ignore this section if you have no environment to test against.

Rollback Plan

Changes to Security Controls

PCI review checklist

  • I have documented a clear reason for, and description of, the change I am making.

  • If applicable, I've documented a plan to revert these changes if they require more than reverting the pull request.

  • If applicable, I've documented the impact of any changes to security controls.

    Examples of changes to security controls include using new access control methods, adding or removing logging pipelines, etc.

If you have any questions, please contact your direct supervisor, GRC (#team-grc), or the PCI working group (#proj-pci-reboot). You can also find more information at PCI Compliance.

@isivaselvan isivaselvan requested a review from a team as a code owner October 7, 2025 09:13
Copy link
Member

@iam404 iam404 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@iam404 iam404 merged commit 9a1c043 into main Oct 7, 2025
11 checks passed
@iam404 iam404 deleted the isivaselvan/PolicySpecs branch October 28, 2025 06:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants