[msp430]: a way skip nanolib for MSP430

[Pillar1989]

I think that's a way to remove one to-do item in your code.

[cr1901]

Well, that indeed works for boards from TI, but I wanted something specific to "projects using msp430 the arch", regardless of which board you're using.

And I forgot at this point why this was a "TODO" (maybe there's no easy way to extract arch using rules.mk?). Your patch is fine for now tho.

[hathach]

not all board will have an msp_exp430 in their name. Marketing people will prefer to have AI, Super, in the product name 😄 . @cr1901 we can do it simply by moving msp430 into its own family with shared `family.mk' e.g stm32f4 https://github.com/hathach/tinyusb/tree/master/hw/bsp/stm32f4 . Though I am too lazy to do that with a family with only 1 board 😄 . will wait until some people make PR for another msp430 .

PS: it is in the common rules.mk, moving to family with skip nanolib flags maybe better. But I think using the CROSS_COMPILE test with msp430-elf- would be great for now.

[hathach]

can you use CROSS_COMPILE which is more accurate in this case.

[hathach]

can you use CROSS_COMPILE which is more accurate in this case.

ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE), msp430-elf-)

[Pillar1989]

It looks like you can easily modify it just a bit.