[idea] Zeroclaw integration pr to support herdr out of the box

[eugeneb50]

idea / problem

zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw#8337 have basic intergration for cli interactive mode working in zeroclaw. Should I create a doc update pr for herdr?

requested change

Acknowledge the zeroclaw integration

why you want this

It helps the commuinty grow and I use both herdr and zeroclaw together.

[eugeneb50]

Consider a generic integration adapter that allows simple multi agent integration with a standardize session_id relay similar to the opencode integration, even better exposes most of the agent functionality for easy tool like integration across the agent ecosystem.

[eugeneb50]

zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw#8337 Zeroclaw Herdr integration has blockers fixed and is waiting for approval and deployment. Consider adding to the list of supported integrations that works out of the box when it deploys. Uses agent alias and the pane suffix to create uniquely named agents. Will consider the deeper functional integration on acknowledgement.

[eugeneb50]

Zeroclaw herdr integration is cleared review just waiting for one more sign off.

[eugeneb50]

redesigned integration to improve performance. Release blocked waiting for reply here.

[eugeneb50]

The release for Zeroclaw cli herdr support is on dock now. Can I open a PR to add Zeroclaw as an official integration? There is interest for zerocode to be supported as well. Or should we go to the plugin route? I can invest time to bring Zerocode and Zeroclaw cli upto at least the level of the Opencode integration with session_id handling if you authorize it.