Skip to content

Conversation

@gsmet
Copy link
Member

@gsmet gsmet commented Jan 23, 2019

This PR fixes 2 things:

  • the fact that all the classes were rewritten even if not enhanced (i.e. when the class was not enhanced, it was still rewritten anyway which generates quite a lot of useless I/O);
  • we had a lot of performance issues with the ByteBuddy implementation mostly related to memory allocation (we allocated a lot of objects due to DSL usage).

This is all fixed by this set of patches.

It also includes the commit from #2750 (so let's wait for this PR to be merged before merging this one).

@gsmet gsmet force-pushed the bytebuddy-backports-5.3 branch from 2d9ab12 to 9d9f528 Compare January 29, 2019 14:37
@gsmet
Copy link
Member Author

gsmet commented Feb 21, 2019

This one has been merged.

@gsmet gsmet closed this Feb 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants