Skip to content

fix: Treat empty custom_headers as absent#741

Merged
alexluong merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix/empty-custom-headers
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

fix: Treat empty custom_headers as absent#741
alexluong merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix/empty-custom-headers

Conversation

@alexluong
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes #709

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

alexluong and others added 2 commits March 10, 2026 22:57
…error

Closes #709

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
No longer needed now that the backend treats {} as absent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented Mar 10, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
outpost-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 10, 2026 4:00pm
outpost-website Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 10, 2026 4:00pm

Request Review

@vercel vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – outpost-docs March 10, 2026 16:00 Inactive
@vercel vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – outpost-website March 10, 2026 16:00 Inactive
@alexluong alexluong merged commit 224c616 into main Mar 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@alexluong alexluong deleted the fix/empty-custom-headers branch March 10, 2026 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reconsider strict validation of empty custom_headers in webhook destinations

2 participants