Fix printer.process macro to accept multiple values #568
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is #566, but rebased after fixing the CI.
Original PR description:
This Pull request fixes the following issue:
When implementing the operators, some would want to write
CHECK(p1,three == Fraction{3,1});, but the compiler complains with the following error:So it is mandatory to include an additional
(), like so:CHECK(p1,(three == Fraction{3,1}));This Pull request makes it possible to write it in a shorter form:
CHECK(p1,three == Fraction{3,1});