chore: updated docs and links #458
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
docs
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.md(2 hunks)api-server/fixtures/payloads/works.json5(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: The verb “is” doesn’t seem to fit in this context, “are” is probably more formally correct.
Context: ...on your development requirements, there is a few options to use Makefile. ```shel...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_IS_ARE)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
api-server/fixtures/payloads/works.json5 (2)
12-13: LGTM! Tech stack updates reflect platform migration
The changes appropriately reflect the migration from GKE/Cloud Native Buildpacks to Railway/Nixpacks for deployment.
6-6: Verify the new URL is accessible
The URL has been updated to a new domain. Let's verify it's accessible and properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
URL update verified and accessible
The new URL (https://www.bennu-official.page) is properly configured and accessible, returning a HTTP 200 status code with appropriate security headers (CORS, X-Frame-Options, etc.) in place.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the new URL is accessible and returns a successful status code
curl -I https://www.bennu-official.page
Length of output: 756
README.md (2)
Line range hint 5-11: LGTM! Clear architecture description
The architecture section now clearly describes the tech stack and provides a good overview for users.
29-40: LGTM! Comprehensive motivations section
The motivations section effectively outlines both the GitHub features being leveraged and personal development goals.
| For bringing up all components required, [Makefile](./Makefile) has prepared. \ | ||
| Depending on your development requirements, there is a few options to use Makefile. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Directory Layouts | ||
| TBD | ||
| ```shell | ||
| # Starting Frontend and Backend directly on your machine | ||
| % make all | ||
|
|
||
| # Build Frontend code bases and pulling containerized Backend images for UI | ||
| % make prod | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix grammar and update Makefile command descriptions
The Makefile commands are correctly implemented and functional, but there are grammar issues in both the README and Makefile that should be fixed:
- In README.md, apply the suggested grammar fixes:
-For bringing up all components required, [Makefile](./Makefile) has prepared. \
-Depending on your development requirements, there is a few options to use Makefile.
+For bringing up all required components, a [Makefile](./Makefile) has been prepared. \
+Depending on your development requirements, there are a few options to use the Makefile.- In Makefile, fix typos in target descriptions:
all: ## Start all componentes of application->all: ## Start all components of applicationprod: --check-docker ## Start emulate productin with build artifacts->prod: --check-docker ## Start emulate production with build artifacts
🔗 Analysis chain
Fix grammar and verify Makefile commands
The Makefile instructions are helpful, but there's a grammar issue and we should verify the commands.
Fix the grammar in the introduction:
-For bringing up all components required, [Makefile](./Makefile) has prepared. \
-Depending on your development requirements, there is a few options to use Makefile.
+For bringing up all required components, a [Makefile](./Makefile) has been prepared. \
+Depending on your development requirements, there are a few options to use the Makefile.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify Makefile targets exist and are properly configured
grep -A 1 "^all:" Makefile
grep -A 1 "^prod:" Makefile
Length of output: 258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the complete Makefile targets and their dependencies
cat Makefile
Length of output: 2860
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: The verb “is” doesn’t seem to fit in this context, “are” is probably more formally correct.
Context: ...on your development requirements, there is a few options to use Makefile. ```shel...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_IS_ARE)
Issue/PR link
closes: #222
What does this PR do?
Describe what changes you make in your branch:
(Optional) Additional Contexts
Describe additional information for reviewers (i.e. What does not included)
mainto confirm changes would be appliedSummary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
README.mdto clarify project architecture and local setup instructions, including the use of aMakefile.Content Updates