Skip to content

Conversation

@hwakabh
Copy link
Owner

@hwakabh hwakabh commented Mar 21, 2025

Issue/PR link

relates: #564

What does this PR do?

Describe what changes you make in your branch:

  • added id-token: write permissions for git-pr-release

(Optional) Additional Contexts

Describe additional information for reviewers (i.e. What does not included)

  • e2e testings are not included in this PR, since this requires merge into main to confirm changes would be applied

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced the automation process to support secure, token-based authentication during releases.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow configuration by introducing a new permission setting. Specifically, the id-token permission is added with a value of write, allowing the workflow to generate and utilize an ID token for authentication purposes. The existing permissions for contents (read) and pull-requests (write) remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/git-pr-release.yaml Added id-token: write permission to enable generation and use of an ID token; existing permissions for contents and pull-requests are retained.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ci, deploy


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3cf7519 and 522ad95.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/git-pr-release.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/git-pr-release.yaml (1)

9-13: Explicit Permission Grant for id-token: write Added

The new permission for id-token: write is correctly added to the permissions block, enabling the workflow to generate and utilize an ID token as required by the git-pr-release job. This change appropriately complements the existing permissions for contents (read) and pull-requests (write). Please ensure that downstream steps that rely on the ID token are secured and behave as expected during actual release operations.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added bugs Something isn't working ci Topics on workflows or automations deploy Features depending on application runtimes labels Mar 21, 2025
@hwakabh hwakabh merged commit 3b56d17 into main Mar 21, 2025
7 checks passed
@hwakabh hwakabh deleted the fix/git-pr-release branch March 21, 2025 05:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugs Something isn't working ci Topics on workflows or automations deploy Features depending on application runtimes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants