Skip to content

fix(changeset): update package name from epds to ePDS#69

Merged
aspiers merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/changeset-package-name
Apr 10, 2026
Merged

fix(changeset): update package name from epds to ePDS#69
aspiers merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/changeset-package-name

Conversation

@aspiers
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@aspiers aspiers commented Apr 10, 2026

Summary

  • The consent-upstream-oauth-ui changeset still referenced the old package name epds, which was renamed to ePDS in 6e35c8d
  • This caused the release workflow to fail with Found changeset for package epds which is not in the workspace

Test plan

  • Re-run the release workflow after merge and confirm it passes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Apr 10, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
epds-demo Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:32pm

Request Review

@railway-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

railway-app bot commented Apr 10, 2026

🚅 Deployed to the ePDS-pr-69 environment in ePDS

Service Status Web Updated (UTC)
@certified-app/demo ✅ Success (View Logs) Web Apr 10, 2026 at 7:32 pm
@certified-app/demo untrusted ✅ Success (View Logs) Web Apr 10, 2026 at 7:31 pm
@certified-app/pds-core ✅ Success (View Logs) Web Apr 10, 2026 at 7:31 pm
@certified-app/auth-service ✅ Success (View Logs) Web Apr 10, 2026 at 7:31 pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@aspiers has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 10 minutes and 44 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 2889d070-aa8a-4575-871d-4308acc0bdfd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43f6366 and fe7a378.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .changeset/consent-upstream-oauth-ui.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/changeset-package-name

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

The consent-upstream-oauth-ui changeset still referenced the old
package name "epds", which was renamed to "ePDS" in 6e35c8d.
This caused the release workflow to fail with "Found changeset for
package epds which is not in the workspace".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@aspiers aspiers force-pushed the fix/changeset-package-name branch from c5cb5e6 to fe7a378 Compare April 10, 2026 19:31
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@aspiers aspiers merged commit 82548a5 into main Apr 10, 2026
13 of 14 checks passed
@aspiers aspiers deleted the fix/changeset-package-name branch April 10, 2026 19:32
@coveralls-official
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coveralls-official bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Coverage Report for CI Build 24260517704

Warning

Build has drifted: This PR's base is out of sync with its target branch, so coverage data may include unrelated changes.
Quick fix: rebase this PR. Learn more →

Coverage remained the same at 31.705%

Details

  • Coverage remained the same as the base build.
  • Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
  • No coverage regressions found.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

No coverage regressions found.


Coverage Stats

Coverage Status
Relevant Lines: 1671
Covered Lines: 554
Line Coverage: 33.15%
Relevant Branches: 950
Covered Branches: 277
Branch Coverage: 29.16%
Branches in Coverage %: Yes
Coverage Strength: 2.79 hits per line

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant