Remove name from surrogate job obj #1092
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Ludvig Liljenberg <4257730+ludfjig@users.noreply.github.com>
ludfjig
requested review from
danbugs,
dblnz,
devigned,
jprendes,
marosset,
simongdavies and
syntactically
as code owners
Contributor
|
I've not looked inot it but I wonder if the way we handle the surrogate process binary will also cause problems? |
Contributor
|
Fixes #319 |
simongdavies
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2025
jsturtevant
reviewed
Dec 10, 2025
jsturtevant
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On windows using hyperlight in multiple processes is not supported because CreateJobObjectA will fail due to using identical names. This PR fixes that. See https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/nf-winbase-createjobobjecta
The specific use case that inspired this pr was running multiple hyperlight tests at the same time