docs(archaeology): preserve 2026-05-26 Lemma B pivot audit + session notes

docs/reports/audit/audit-2026-05-26-lemma-b-option-2-obstacle.md

@@ -1,3 +1,24 @@
+<!--
+  🛑 ARCHAEOLOGY DOCUMENT — preserved for the pathway-to-counterexample record.
+
+  This audit was written 2026-05-26 BEFORE the verified Coq counterexample
+  (formal/Counterexample.v, 5 Qed) showed that the preservation theorem
+  it attempts to close is provably false.
+
+  Its conclusions / closure plans / "just one more lemma" framings are
+  pre-discovery. DO NOT apply them to current proof work.
+
+  The post-discovery doctrine lives at:
+    - STATUS.adoc (past / present / future map)
+    - formal/PRESERVATION-DESIGN.md (four-layer architecture)
+    - PROOF-NEEDS.md (per-sublanguage proof debt)
+    - CLAUDE.md (owner directive 2026-05-27)
+
+  This file is preserved because the audit text DOCUMENTS the obstacle
+  that led to the counterexample discovery — useful historical record,
+  not instructions.
+-->
+
 <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: PMPL-1.0-or-later -->
 
 # Audit Report: ephapax — 2026-05-26 — Lemma B Phase 2 Option 2 obstacle

docs/reports/audit/audit-2026-05-26-standards-134-reconciliation.md

@@ -1,3 +1,24 @@
+<!--
+  🛑 ARCHAEOLOGY DOCUMENT — preserved for the pathway-to-counterexample record.
+
+  This audit was written 2026-05-26 BEFORE the verified Coq counterexample
+  (formal/Counterexample.v, 5 Qed) showed that the preservation theorem
+  it attempts to close is provably false.
+
+  Its conclusions / closure plans / "just one more lemma" framings are
+  pre-discovery. DO NOT apply them to current proof work.
+
+  The post-discovery doctrine lives at:
+    - STATUS.adoc (past / present / future map)
+    - formal/PRESERVATION-DESIGN.md (four-layer architecture)
+    - PROOF-NEEDS.md (per-sublanguage proof debt)
+    - CLAUDE.md (owner directive 2026-05-27)
+
+  This file is preserved because the audit text DOCUMENTS the obstacle
+  that led to the counterexample discovery — useful historical record,
+  not instructions.
+-->
+
 <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: PMPL-1.0-or-later -->
 
 # Audit Report: ephapax — 2026-05-26 — standards#134 reconciliation

docs/sessions/SESSION-2026-05-26-lemma-b-pivot.adoc

@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+////
+  🛑 ARCHAEOLOGY DOCUMENT — preserved for the pathway-to-counterexample record.
+
+  This session note records the 2026-05-26 Lemma B pivot, BEFORE the
+  verified Coq counterexample (formal/Counterexample.v, 5 Qed) showed
+  that the preservation theorem it attempts to close is provably false.
+
+  Its conclusions / closure plans / "just one more lemma" framings are
+  pre-discovery. DO NOT apply them to current proof work.
+
+  Post-discovery doctrine: STATUS.adoc + formal/PRESERVATION-DESIGN.md
+  + PROOF-NEEDS.md + CLAUDE.md (owner directive 2026-05-27).
+
+  This file is preserved for historical accuracy, not as instructions.
+////
+
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: PMPL-1.0-or-later
 // SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2026 Jonathan D.A. Jewell
 = Session: Lemma B Phase 2 — case-count truthing + Option 2 obstacle + Path 1 pivot (2026-05-26)