docs(adr): 0008-contractile-ci#96
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…umer exists Closes #60. The `just contractile-check` recipe prints OK/MISSING for the four contractile files. Nothing in CI currently fails when one is missing. The question: should CI enforce that, or stop pretending contractiles are enforced? ADR-0008 picks **informational-only**. Rationale: - Nothing in this repo *consumes* the contractile files at runtime. The Justfile only checks file existence; that's the only invariant we can usefully verify without a parser we haven't built. - Failing the build on a missing file produces churn-noise. Contributors will copy the file from another repo to satisfy CI without understanding what it's for. - The RSR-antipattern workflow already enforces broader structural rules; this is duplicative. When a real consumer exists (Rust crate parsing the files at build time, governance dashboard, etc.) reopen the ADR and flip the decision. Also adds a one-line comment to the Justfile recipe pointing at ADR-0008, so future contributors know why the recipe runs but isn't required. Contributes one fewer required check toward V-L3-F1 / #59. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Per V-L3-O1: should CI enforce the contractile-check or treat it as decorative?
Pick informational-only. Rationale:
When a real consumer exists (parser, governance dashboard, etc.), reopen the ADR and flip the decision.
Also adds a one-line comment to the Justfile recipe pointing at ADR-0008 so future contributors aren't surprised.
Contributes one fewer required check toward V-L3-F1 / #59.
Closes
Test plan
docs/decisions/0008-contractile-ci.adocrecords the decision + reasoning + reverse conditionJustfile::contractile-checkannotated with the rationaleDoc-only + one-line comment in Justfile.