Skip to content

Conversation

@aaron-steinfeld
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This vuln was fixed in upstream, new build will grab it automatically.

@aaron-steinfeld aaron-steinfeld requested a review from a team June 14, 2023 15:44
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Test Results

102 tests  ±0   102 ✔️ ±0   13s ⏱️ -5s
  24 suites ±0       0 💤 ±0 
  24 files   ±0       0 ±0 

Results for commit 600d745. ± Comparison against base commit dc6b2b5.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 14, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #168 (600d745) into main (dc6b2b5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #168   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     82.82%   82.82%           
  Complexity      281      281           
=========================================
  Files            33       33           
  Lines           949      949           
  Branches         73       73           
=========================================
  Hits            786      786           
  Misses          111      111           
  Partials         52       52           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 82.82% <ø> (ø)
unit 69.72% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@aaron-steinfeld aaron-steinfeld merged commit 00c675e into main Jun 14, 2023
@aaron-steinfeld aaron-steinfeld deleted the vulns branch June 14, 2023 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants