Skip to content

I2OS Integrated Runtime Governance Stack v2.0 Draft

Pre-release
Pre-release

Choose a tag to compare

View all tags
@i2os-lab i2os-lab released this 12 Jun 12:01
· 1 commit to main since this release
v2.0-draft
80720cc
This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
Verified
Learn about vigilant mode.

I2OS Integrated Runtime Governance Stack v2.0 Draft

This draft release introduces I2OS Integrated Runtime Governance Stack v2.0.

Version 2.0 integrates the previous I2OS runtime governance layers into one continuous governance stack.

This is not an additional isolated layer.

It is the first integrated structure that connects:

v1.1 Runtime Classification
v1.2 Runtime Evaluation
v1.3 Trace / Audit
v1.4 Recovery / Repair
v1.5 Governance Report

into a single runtime governance process.

Core Question

Can classification, evaluation, audit, repair, and reporting
be integrated into one runtime governance stack?

Structural Progression

The project has progressed through the following sequence:

v1.0
Post-Scaling Intelligence Efficiency
        ↓
v1.1
Minimal Runtime Efficiency Gate
        ↓
v1.2
Runtime Evaluation Layer
        ↓
v1.3
Runtime Trace / Audit Layer
        ↓
v1.4
Recovery / Repair Path Layer
        ↓
v1.5
Runtime Governance Report Layer
        ↓
v2.0
Integrated Runtime Governance Stack

In short:

Theory
        ↓
Classification
        ↓
Evaluation
        ↓
Audit
        ↓
Repair
        ↓
Report
        ↓
Integrated Runtime Governance Stack

What v2.0 Adds

v2.0 integrates the previous layers into one continuous runtime flow:

Proposed AI Transition
        ↓
Runtime Classification
        ↓
GO / HOLD / REPAIR / BLOCK
        ↓
Runtime Evaluation
        ↓
EFFECTIVE / PARTIAL / NEUTRAL / FAILED
        ↓
Trace / Audit
        ↓
VALID / QUESTIONABLE / INSUFFICIENT / INVALID
        ↓
Recovery / Repair
        ↓
REPAIRED / CONFIRMATION_REQUIRED / NO_REPAIR_AVAILABLE
        ↓
Governance Report
        ↓
Human-Verifiable Governance Outcome

The final integrated outcomes are:

ALLOW
HOLD_FOR_CONFIRMATION
ALLOW_AFTER_REPAIR
BLOCK_NO_REPAIR
REVIEW_AUDIT
FAILED_GOVERNANCE

Included in This Draft

This release includes:

  • Integrated Runtime Governance Stack v2.0 specification
  • Minimal integrated runtime stack prototype
  • Integrated runtime stack test cases
  • README links for the v2.0 integration phase

Main files:

docs/integrated_runtime_governance_stack_v2_0.md
src/i2os_integrated_runtime_stack.py
tests/integrated_runtime_stack_cases.md

Why v2.0 Matters

Before v2.0, each layer could be understood independently:

Classification
Evaluation
Audit
Repair
Report

v2.0 connects them into one runtime governance process.

This changes the structure from separate governance modules into an integrated AI runtime governance stack.

The system no longer asks only:

What can the AI do?

It asks:

What transition is being proposed?
Should it be allowed?
Was the decision effective?
Can it be audited?
Can it be repaired?
Can humans verify the final governance outcome?

Relationship to Post-Scaling Efficiency

Post-Scaling Intelligence Efficiency argues that future AI efficiency is not only about larger models or faster computation.

It is also about reducing computation that should never have been generated.

v2.0 operationalizes that idea by integrating:

  • pre-execution classification
  • decision evaluation
  • traceability
  • auditability
  • repairability
  • human-verifiable reporting

This turns post-scaling efficiency into runtime governance.

Boundary of This Draft

This v2.0 release remains a draft prototype.

It does not claim to be:

A full enterprise AI safety platform
A regulatory compliance system
A certified security tool
A complete agent runtime sandbox
A cryptographic audit system
A production-grade execution firewall

Instead, it defines the structural foundation for an integrated runtime governance stack.

The goal is to make AI transitions more admissible, inspectable, repairable, and human-verifiable.

Core Principle

Capability is not permission.
Permission should be evaluated.
Evaluation should be traceable.
Unsafe transitions should be repairable when possible.
Runtime governance should be reportable.
Governance layers should be integrated.

A system may be capable of generating or executing a transition.

That does not mean the transition should be permitted.

And if permission is classified, it should be evaluated, traced, repaired when possible, and summarized in a human-verifiable report.

This is the beginning of I2OS Integrated Runtime Governance Stack v2.0.

Assets 3
Loading