Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewkirillov-ibm
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes issues #3

@ibmmqmet
Copy link
Contributor

I don't like the hardcoded 104. Better to use MQXQH_CURRENT_LENGTH-MQMD_LENGTH_1. Makes it a lot clearer how the value is calculated

@andrewkirillov-ibm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated the code to make it cleaner

@ibmmqmet ibmmqmet merged commit fecdb75 into ibm-messaging:main Oct 23, 2025
@ibmmqmet
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks. I've merged that. It'll be part of a formal release next time I do that. Note that if you want to look at the contents of the embedded MQMD - eg to look at the Format of the "real" message body so you can then work with the body contents itself - then there's proably a bit more work needed as elsewhere we tend to assume the MQMD is always a V2. Which is not true with the XQH's MQMD

@andrewkirillov-ibm andrewkirillov-ibm deleted the xqh-fix branch October 23, 2025 12:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants