Replies: 4 comments 9 replies
|
Hi @Dr-QingHe, Thanks for your post. It is best to describe your hardware, OS, and TI-Toolbox version when reporting a potential bug or weird behavior. CHARM process should take about 1.0h to 1.5h depending on your hardware, whereas RECON-ALL could potentially take about 4h+. Your screenshot did not show the latest output so I do not know what happened last. Also, you can look in the Thanks, |
|
Hi @idossha Qing |
|
Hi @Dr-QingHe — thank you for the details and screenshots. A quick update: v2.3.1 includes GUI lifecycle and error-reporting improvements for long-running preprocessing jobs. This does not fundamentally change expected CHARM / recon-all runtime, but it should make the GUI less ambiguous: preprocessing subprocess failures are now detected more reliably, dependent tabs refresh only after successful outputs, and failure messages point users toward the relevant logs and expected inputs. These changes should be released with v2.3.1 in the coming days. If you still see a >20h preprocessing run after updating, please send the latest console output plus the log file under |



Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi guys,

I configured the TI-toolbox yesterday afternoon and then ran preprocessing on a subject's structural MRI (T1) in Docker. However, the process still hasn't finished as of now (11:30 am; more than 20 hours since the processing started). The software interface appears to be frozen, but there are no error messages (as shown in the screenshot). Is this situation normal?
Qing
All reactions