Feature/delay#207
Conversation
|
LOVE IT, but tests failed. |
|
@jamonholmgren it looks like the comparison of 0.011084.<(0.011) is causing some kind of error on this machine... Maybe a little more leeway? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
.should.be.close 0.011, 0.01
|
Does this issue need some assistance? |
|
Gant would you check this and merge it if it passes |
|
Yeah, I'll try to investigate the test. Even if it's a great feature we might need to mute the test a bit if it causes master to fail tests. I'll check into it. |
|
@GantMan I just totally ignored you after you told me what was going on. Fixed now. |
|
@jamonholmgren that's ok, I think that means we're in a relationship now. |
|
wait... was this ever fixed? I'm unable to run tests locally now, and this is crashing it. |
|
Turns out it SOMETIMES fails :/ Might be worth adding another level of fuzziness. .009 instead of .01 |
|
@GantMan Yours is failing with 0.009 seconds? It should never go below 0.01... O_o |
|
I made a PR, and I linked to travis failing on 0.008! So I moved the test to 0.007. I know it sucks, but travis is crapping out on all my PRs today, bc of this. |


Adds
app.after(/delay) and app.every.