Prd 4987

[sarah-inkeep]

No description provided.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
agents-docs	Ready	Preview	Comment	Oct 7, 2025 6:54pm
agents-manage-api	Ready	Preview	Comment	Oct 7, 2025 6:54pm
agents-manage-ui	Ready	Preview	Comment	Oct 7, 2025 6:54pm
agents-run-api	Ready	Preview	Comment	Oct 7, 2025 6:54pm

[claude]

Claude finished @sarah-inkeep's task —— View job

---

PR Review Analysis - Complete ✓

Summary

This PR implements a visual enhancement to highlight active tools in the MCP server's available tools list. The changes introduce a clear visual distinction between tools that are currently active vs. those that are available but not active.

Code Quality Assessment

✅ Strengths

• Clear Intent: The changeset clearly describes the feature intent
• Type Safety: Proper TypeScript interfaces and type guards (!!isActive)
• Consistent Patterns: Follows existing UI component patterns and uses the established Badge component system
• Clean Logic: The active tool determination logic is straightforward and handles edge cases well

🔍 Areas for Consideration

1. Logic Clarity & Edge Case Handling

Medium Priority

The active tool determination logic in available-tools-card.tsx:124-125:

const isActive = activeTools === undefined ? true : activeTools?.includes(availableTool.name);

Considerations:

• The logic assumes activeTools === undefined means "all tools active" - this should be documented or validated against the business logic
• The optional chaining activeTools?.includes() suggests activeTools could be null, but the type signature shows it as undefined or string array
• Consider extracting this logic into a utility function for better testability and reusability

Suggestion:

// Extract to utility function
const isToolActive = (toolName: string, activeTools: string[] | undefined): boolean => {
  // undefined means all tools are active (document this behavior)
  return activeTools === undefined || activeTools.includes(toolName);
};

2. Visual Design Consistency

Low-Medium Priority

The visual distinction uses variant="primary" for active tools and variant="code" for inactive tools, but applies additional styling:

<Badge
  variant={isActive ? 'primary' : 'code'}
  className={cn(!isActive && 'bg-transparent text-foreground')}
>

Considerations:

• The conditional className override (bg-transparent text-foreground) for inactive tools might conflict with the code variant's built-in styling
• This creates a third visual state that isn't defined in the Badge component's variants
• Consider adding a dedicated Badge variant for "inactive tools" instead of overriding styles

3. Component Interface Design

Low Priority

The AvailableToolsCard component now requires both tools and activeTools props, creating a dependency relationship.

Considerations:

• The component now has dual responsibilities: displaying available tools AND indicating active status
• This couples the component to the concept of "active" tools, reducing reusability
• Consider if this component should be renamed to reflect its dual purpose

4. Accessibility & User Experience

Medium Priority

The visual distinction only relies on color/styling differences.

Considerations:

• Users with color vision deficiencies may not be able to distinguish active vs inactive tools
• No semantic indication (aria-labels, titles) to communicate the active/inactive state
• The existing tooltip system could be extended to provide this information

Suggestion:

<Badge
  variant={isActive ? 'primary' : 'code'}
  ? 'Active tool' : 'Available but inactive'}
  - ${isActive ? 'active' : 'inactive'}`}
>

5. Testing Considerations

Medium Priority

The changes introduce conditional rendering logic that should be tested:

• Tools with activeTools === undefined (all active)
• Tools with specific activeTools array
• Tools with empty activeTools array
• Tools not in the activeTools list

Architecture & System Design

✅ Follows Established Patterns

• Uses existing Badge component variants appropriately
• Maintains TypeScript type safety with proper imports from @inkeep/agents-core
• Follows the component composition pattern used elsewhere in the codebase

✅ Data Flow Consistency

• Props are passed down correctly from view-mcp-server-details.tsx to available-tools-card.tsx
• The data contract matches the MCPTool type structure

Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Document the business logic - Add a comment explaining when activeTools === undefined vs empty array vs populated array

Medium Priority:

2. Improve accessibility - Add semantic indicators for active/inactive state
3. Extract utility function - Move the active tool determination logic to a testable utility
4. Add unit tests - Test the various activeTools scenarios

Low Priority:

5. Consider Badge variant - Add a dedicated "inactive" variant instead of className overrides
6. Component naming - Consider if the component name should reflect its dual purpose

Verdict

✅ Approval Recommended - This is a solid enhancement with clear user value. The implementation is clean and follows established patterns. The considerations above are primarily about maintainability and user experience improvements that can be addressed in future iterations.

---