Skip to content

feat: number assertions for num-bigint::BigInt and num-bigint::BigUint#46

Merged
haraldmaida merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
number-assertions-for-num-bigint
Jun 7, 2025
Merged

feat: number assertions for num-bigint::BigInt and num-bigint::BigUint#46
haraldmaida merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
number-assertions-for-num-bigint

Conversation

@haraldmaida
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Implemented number specific assertions for BigInt and BigUint of the num-bigint crate.

@haraldmaida haraldmaida self-assigned this Jun 7, 2025
@haraldmaida haraldmaida added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 7, 2025
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.56%. Comparing base (5196886) to head (a6f87b5).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #46      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.50%   96.56%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          27       28       +1     
  Lines        3231     3291      +60     
  Branches     3231     3291      +60     
==========================================
+ Hits         3118     3178      +60     
  Misses        109      109              
  Partials        4        4              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@haraldmaida haraldmaida merged commit a1dfa4c into main Jun 7, 2025
18 checks passed
@haraldmaida haraldmaida deleted the number-assertions-for-num-bigint branch June 7, 2025 05:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant