Skip to content

feat: number specific assertions for bigdecimal::BigDecimal and bigdecimal::BigDecimalRef#48

Merged
haraldmaida merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feat/number-assertions-for-bigdecimal
Jun 7, 2025
Merged

feat: number specific assertions for bigdecimal::BigDecimal and bigdecimal::BigDecimalRef#48
haraldmaida merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feat/number-assertions-for-bigdecimal

Conversation

@haraldmaida
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Implemented number specific assertions for BigDecimal and BigDecimalRef of the bigdecimal crate.

@haraldmaida haraldmaida self-assigned this Jun 7, 2025
@haraldmaida haraldmaida added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 7, 2025
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.62%. Comparing base (48d7981) to head (43487c0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #48      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.58%   96.62%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          29       30       +1     
  Lines        3309     3345      +36     
  Branches     3309     3345      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits         3196     3232      +36     
  Misses        109      109              
  Partials        4        4              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@haraldmaida haraldmaida merged commit 130cc5f into main Jun 7, 2025
18 checks passed
@haraldmaida haraldmaida deleted the feat/number-assertions-for-bigdecimal branch June 7, 2025 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant