Skip to content

Conversation

@marcin-mazurek
Copy link
Contributor

@marcin-mazurek marcin-mazurek commented Jul 6, 2023

This PR improves the Catalyst voting UI by removing confusing next fund snapshot date (we will only show info around the current fund) as well as removes any mentions of the fund number from the registration flow (since the user registers for Catalyst voting in general and not for a specific fund).

Screenshots

Screenshot 2023-07-06 at 23 19 46
Screenshot 2023-07-06 at 23 19 55
Screenshot 2023-07-06 at 23 20 04
Screenshot 2023-07-06 at 23 22 23
Screenshot 2023-07-06 at 23 22 32
Screenshot 2023-07-06 at 23 20 10
Screenshot 2023-07-06 at 23 26 08

Testing Checklist


Review Checklist

Basics

  • PR assigned to the PR author(s)
  • input-output-hk/daedalus-dev and input-output-hk/daedalus-qa assigned as PR reviewers
  • PR has appropriate labels (release-vNext, feature/bug/chore, WIP)
  • PR link is added to a Jira ticket, ticket moved to In Review
  • PR is updated to the most recent version of the target branch (and there are no conflicts)
  • PR has a good description that summarizes all changes
  • PR contains screenshots (in case of UI changes)
  • CHANGELOG entry has been added to the top of the appropriate section (Features, Fixes, Chores) and is linked to the correct PR on GitHub
  • There are no missing translations (running yarn manage:translations produces no changes)
  • Text changes are proofread and approved (Jane Wild / Amy Reeve)
  • Japanese text changes are proofread and approved (Junko Oda)
  • Storybook works and no stories are broken (yarn storybook)
  • In case of dependency changes yarn.lock file is updated

Code Quality

  • Important parts of the code are properly commented and documented
  • Code is properly typed with typescript types
  • React components are split-up enough to avoid unnecessary re-renderings
  • Any code that only works in main process is neatly separated from components

Testing

  • New feature/change is covered by acceptance tests
  • New feature/change is manually tested and approved by QA team
  • All existing acceptance tests are still up-to-date
  • New feature/change is covered by Daedalus Testing scenario
  • All existing Daedalus Testing scenarios are still up-to-date

After Review

  • Update Slack QA thread by marking it with a green checkmark


### Features

- Show "To be defined" if date of the next Catalyst fund is in the past ([PR 3105](https://github.com/input-output-hk/daedalus/pull/3105))
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replacing CHANGELOG entry on purpose - effectively, what was delivered in this unreleased PR, was deleted

@tomislavhoracek tomislavhoracek self-requested a review July 7, 2023 14:02
Copy link
Collaborator

@tomislavhoracek tomislavhoracek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@marcin-mazurek nice job 💯

@marcin-mazurek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Credits to @lucas-barros too ;)

Copy link
Member

@DominikGuzei DominikGuzei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

much better like this 👏

@miorsufianiohk miorsufianiohk self-requested a review July 10, 2023 12:41
@gabriela-ponce
Copy link

@marcin-mazurek this looks ok overall, but there is a detail with the default name of the pdf file on the last step.
Previously it was "fundXX-voting-registration-WalletName-Date.pdf". On the latest build the name is "fund-voting-registration-WalletName-Date.pdf". Maybe the word "fund" could be removed? It seems irrelevant now.

@marcin-mazurek
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gabriela-ponce good point, I've replaced "fund" with "catalyst" - can you re-check?
image

@miorsufianiohk
Copy link

Hi @marcin-mazurek
The PR is looking good so far. However, I found an issue which is not related to this PR which I could reproduce on production and dev, The Newsletter link appears to be broken. So, I have been wondering if we are going to fix this at all? or whether in the scope of this PR or another PR? See screenshot

@marcin-mazurek
Copy link
Contributor Author

@miorsufianiohk I asked Catalyst team to review all links, seems like there is more links that require updating. Good catch!

Copy link

@miorsufianiohk miorsufianiohk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Great work @marcin-mazurek 👍

@marcin-mazurek marcin-mazurek merged commit 58e6a07 into develop Jul 11, 2023
@marcin-mazurek marcin-mazurek deleted the feature/ddw-1222-catalyst-ui-improvements branch July 11, 2023 12:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants