Skip to content

Conversation

@tkerber
Copy link

@tkerber tkerber commented Apr 29, 2024

This is currently required, as verification checks n and/or k against the proof / verifier key, and fails if these do not match. As a result, I need to be able to interpret the params as ones with a lower k, even if this is a noop.

@tkerber tkerber force-pushed the tkerber/downsize-verifier-params branch from 9988f8a to b7e49d5 Compare April 29, 2024 11:43
@iquerejeta iquerejeta requested review from davidnevadoc and removed request for miguel-ambrona April 29, 2024 12:41
@tkerber tkerber closed this Apr 29, 2024
iquerejeta referenced this pull request in midnightntwrk/halo2 Apr 8, 2025
We mutate the polynomial (with all zeroes) to be consistent with the behaviour.
iquerejeta referenced this pull request in midnightntwrk/halo2 Apr 14, 2025
We mutate the polynomial (with all zeroes) to be consistent with the behaviour.
iquerejeta referenced this pull request in midnightntwrk/halo2 May 20, 2025
* Compare polynomials and polynomial commitments by reference.
Issue #1

Not permit duplicate queries
Issue #3

* Add Length of PIs to the transcript
Issue #2

* Check trailing bytes
Issue #6

* Panic if two points are equals in lagrange_interpolate.
Issue input-output-hk#10

* Hash the byte representation of the VK in the transcript Issue #5

We do not add the architecture, as the verifier is already parametrised by that.

* Consistency in polynomial multiplication Issue #7

We mutate the polynomial (with all zeroes) to be consistent with the behaviour.

* Make commitment homomorphic, and don't send evals of pieces - Issue#0
dkaidalov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025
* FS: add instance length before instances and not after (more intuitive)

* prover: rename variable

* add support for committed instances

* examples: adapt [vector-ops-unblinded] to test committed instances

* prover: create support for [commit_to_instances]

* examples: generalize example on committed instances

* Address PR feedback
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants