-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 796
[SYCL][NewOffload] Introduce specialization constants in clang-linker-wrapper #15133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d9d7611
[SYCL][NewOffload] Introduce specialization constants in clang-linker
maksimsab d6ce19c
remove dumping option and add comment
maksimsab db00105
add warning about incompatible usage
maksimsab 19913fd
Merge branch 'sycl' into spec_const2
maksimsab 4a3ef22
enhance documentation
maksimsab File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR!
My understanding of when we should
clang-linker-wrapperargs is when we need to communicate information from the driver toclang-linker-wrapper, where in most cases that happens for user specified command-line args that effect howclang-linker-wrapperneeds to act.For this case, I'm not sure I see why we need the new flag. I don't see any user visible option for Clang to effect spec consts, only logic to set the
-spec-constflag tosycl-post-link, which seems to be a triple-based calculation.Also in this PR I don't see any changes to the driver to set this new flag.
Could you go into detail on why we need this flag and how we plan to modify the driver to set it?
Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 on @sarnex comment here about the need for this mode.
I see the related code here
llvm/clang/tools/clang-linker-wrapper/ClangLinkerWrapper.cpp
Line 646 in 9eaca2b
and the spec-const mode seems to rely on the target triple and nothing else and hence should be computed inside the clang-linker-wrapper.
@maksimsab please let me know if we are missing something here.
Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right. It needs to be redesigned.