Skip to content

Conversation

@uditagarwal97
Copy link
Contributor

I suspect the duplication happened because I first made the change to intel/llvm and then upstream, which brought the change back again to intel/llvm

I suspect the duplication happened because I first made the change to intel/llvm and then upstream, which brought the change back again to intel/llvm
@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 self-assigned this Oct 23, 2025
@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2025 15:51
@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 marked this pull request as draft October 23, 2025 15:52
Comment on lines -212 to -222
# If LLVM_USE_STATIC_ZSTD is specified, make sure we enable zstd only if static
# libraries are found.
if(LLVM_USE_STATIC_ZSTD AND NOT TARGET zstd::libzstd_static)
# Fail if LLVM_ENABLE_ZSTD is FORCE_ON.
if(LLVM_ENABLE_ZSTD STREQUAL FORCE_ON)
message(FATAL_ERROR "Failed to find static zstd libraries, but LLVM_USE_STATIC_ZSTD=ON and LLVM_ENABLE_ZSTD=FORCE_ON.")
endif()
set(LLVM_ENABLE_ZSTD OFF)
else()
set(LLVM_ENABLE_ZSTD ${zstd_FOUND})
endif()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code block is duplicate of the block above. Ideally, it should have been removed in the pulldown commit: 8cb519c

@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2025 16:18
@uditagarwal97
Copy link
Contributor Author

SYCL precommit failures are unrelated.

@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 merged commit 9e58dc3 into sycl Oct 24, 2025
27 of 29 checks passed
@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 deleted the private/udit/zstd_duplication branch October 24, 2025 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants