[CI][Benchmarks] update IGC build dependencies

[pbalcer]

No description provided.

[ldorau]

I still observe the following error:

[llvm/devops/scripts/benchmarks] $ ./main.py ~/workdir --compute-runtime 046187bf4f93ec98ca36f89c3ccd9417025f0c8d --build-igc --dry-run --verbose
[...]
-- [CMFE] Using CMFE library name: libclangFEWrapper.so
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/home/ldorau/workdir/igc-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
See also "/home/ldorau/workdir/igc-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
 <utils.py:108>
2025-12-04 10:15:16,403 - ERROR - CMake Warning at IGC/CMakeLists.txt:168 (message):
  IGC_OPTION__ARCHITECTURE_TARGET: Target architecture is not specified.
  Trying to deduce it from context.


fatal: ambiguous argument 'release/16.x': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
fatal: Not a valid commit name 1ca45b5f5725a447ded14c0096df39f2751c4e9a
fatal: Not a valid commit name 9780cc0e044c73dcd549c67a1278a4ff7daf3b01
fatal: Not a valid commit name bb5e22800857f7dda9a2491a4f2fc7387d4205b0
fatal: Not a valid commit name a60b8f468119065f8a6cb4a16598263cb00de0b5
fatal: Not a valid commit name 62267fec4a0d74472bc64695597f2477cc8c11df
fatal: Not a valid commit name da6a0b7af29a222b2e16a10155b49d4fafe967f3
fatal: Not a valid commit name d2d9d083a2f36b8ccbdd6d1803287031ddaffb22
fatal: Not a valid commit name 88fa0e25d08b80f1573e147ed3b8a30c9791fb5f

[github-actions]

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please consider merging

[github-actions]

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please consider merging

[uditagarwal97]

Hi @pbalcer, I'm not sure if we are good to merge this PR, given the comment above from @ldorau . If it's a work in progress, can we please convert the PR to draft?

[ldorau]

I will test it again today or tomorrow.

[pbalcer]

I will test it again today or tomorrow.

Right, @lplewa tested it as well and it worked fine.

[ldorau]

It works for me now

[ldorau]

Hi @pbalcer, I'm not sure if we are good to merge this PR, given the comment above from @ldorau . If it's a work in progress, can we please convert the PR to draft?

Hi @uditagarwal97 It works for me now, so in my opinion it can be merged.