Skip to content

[Benchmarks] Add RecordWait benchmarks#21441

Merged
kswiecicki merged 1 commit intosyclfrom
luszczewskakasia1_record-wait
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

[Benchmarks] Add RecordWait benchmarks#21441
kswiecicki merged 1 commit intosyclfrom
luszczewskakasia1_record-wait

Conversation

@luszczewskakasia1
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@luszczewskakasia1 luszczewskakasia1 force-pushed the luszczewskakasia1_record-wait branch 3 times, most recently from e4fadbc to e68d7a6 Compare March 4, 2026 12:26
@luszczewskakasia1 luszczewskakasia1 marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2026 12:27
@luszczewskakasia1 luszczewskakasia1 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2026 12:27

benches += [
createTorchSubmitEventRecordWaitBench(
"medium",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have to pass this? There is only a single scenario anyway...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it can be simpified. Now it's added directly.

@luszczewskakasia1 luszczewskakasia1 force-pushed the luszczewskakasia1_record-wait branch from e68d7a6 to 3f05544 Compare March 4, 2026 13:00
@PatKamin PatKamin self-requested a review March 4, 2026 17:25
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2026

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please consider merging

@luszczewskakasia1 luszczewskakasia1 force-pushed the luszczewskakasia1_record-wait branch from 3f05544 to 30e14e2 Compare March 5, 2026 08:09
@kswiecicki kswiecicki merged commit 76cc834 into sycl Mar 5, 2026
14 checks passed
@bader bader deleted the luszczewskakasia1_record-wait branch March 5, 2026 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants