Skip to content

[UR][CTS][L0v2] Extend CI testing with BMG runner#21981

Merged
KornevNikita merged 1 commit into
intel:syclfrom
rbanka1:l0
May 18, 2026
Merged

[UR][CTS][L0v2] Extend CI testing with BMG runner#21981
KornevNikita merged 1 commit into
intel:syclfrom
rbanka1:l0

Conversation

@rbanka1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rbanka1 rbanka1 commented May 11, 2026

No description provided.

@rbanka1 rbanka1 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 11, 2026 14:48
@sarnex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sarnex commented May 11, 2026

Looks like the new CI is failing, please ping us when everything is fixed and this is ready for review, thanks!

Comment thread .github/workflows/ur-precommit.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/ur-precommit.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/ur-build-hw.yml Outdated
@rbanka1 rbanka1 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 14, 2026 12:34
@rbanka1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

rbanka1 commented May 14, 2026

Related issue: #22025

@kswiecicki kswiecicki changed the title L0 testing on BMG [UR][CTS][L0v2] Extend CI testing with BMG runner May 14, 2026
@kswiecicki
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Related issue: #22025

I meant to paste it above the fragments above the UUR_KNOWN_FAILURE_ON macros, so that it is known which issue is related to those known failures.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

+ skip failure tests
@lukaszstolarczuk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@intel/dpcpp-devops-reviewers, I guess you can now review this PR - the CI is all green.

@sys-ce-bb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please consider merging

@KornevNikita KornevNikita merged commit eca4c9f into intel:sycl May 18, 2026
42 checks passed
KornevNikita added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2026
This workflow doesn't actually ping gatekeepers as the regular GHA token
doesn't allow to do this (altough there is a comment from GHA bot,
gatekeepers don't receive a notification/email. Use specific token and comment on behalf of
sys-ce-bb. Test: #21981
KornevNikita added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2026
This workflow doesn't actually ping gatekeepers as the regular GHA token
doesn't allow to do this (altough there is a comment from GHA bot,
gatekeepers don't receive a notification/email). Use specific token and
comment on behalf of
sys-ce-bb. Test: #21981

Also revert the previous unsuccessful WA.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants