Skip to content

Conversation

@mickmis
Copy link
Contributor

@mickmis mickmis commented Jun 18, 2025

Stacked on top of #1055 please only review 6d59aad
This should fix #857

This PR changes type-specific UAS ID evaluation functions so that they support evaluation of both DP and SP observed values.

For the DP, it does so by comparing the observed value with the injected value, and proceeding only if they are equal. This effectively skip the check of the requirements when it cannot be determined whether the UAS ID is valid or not, and it passes the check whenever the values match.

@mickmis mickmis force-pushed the 857/eval_uas_id_types branch from 119d09f to 2715400 Compare June 18, 2025 13:34
@mickmis mickmis force-pushed the 857/eval_uas_id_types branch from 2715400 to 6d59aad Compare July 1, 2025 14:40
@mickmis mickmis requested a review from BenjaminPelletier July 2, 2025 14:31
Copy link
Member

@BenjaminPelletier BenjaminPelletier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Usually smaller PRs are better, but I think this one was actually easier to review than #1055; maybe we just skip #1055 and merge this one instead?

@mickmis mickmis force-pushed the 857/eval_uas_id_types branch from 6d59aad to 3909dab Compare July 16, 2025 10:06
@mickmis
Copy link
Contributor Author

mickmis commented Jul 16, 2025

@BenjaminPelletier in your comments on #1055 I've identified 2 that were still relevant in this PR, which I fixed. LMK if my assessment was wrong and I will follow-up with a fix.

@mickmis mickmis merged commit 6d5508b into interuss:main Jul 16, 2025
21 checks passed
@mickmis mickmis deleted the 857/eval_uas_id_types branch July 16, 2025 10:16
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NET0470 Table 1 Requirements not tested in astm.netrid.v22a.NominalBehavior

2 participants