fix(ios): contenteditable elements are now selectable on iOS #22404
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Oct 29, 2020
TakumaKira
pushed a commit
to TakumaKira/ionic-framework
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2020
…eam#22404) Co-authored-by: Chris Lo <CFT-Chris@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TODO give co-author credit from #18369
Pull request checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
npm run build) was run locally and any changes were pushednpm run lint) has passed locally and any fixes were made for failuresPull request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
What is the current behavior?
user-select: nonecauses contenteditable to be non-selectable in WebKit but input and textarea work fine. This issue does not affect Chromium.Issue Number: resolves #18368
What is the new behavior?
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Other information